• Fjaeger@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s hard to understand for a non American, how it can be a Race between these two and only these two. This two party system seems so absurdly stubid. Not that we have it figured out anywhere else much better, but still.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      If we had Ranked Choice voting, we’d likely have a much more diverse candidate pool. It’s not a perfect solution, but it is better than what we have now

    • Phen@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      And trying to convince people to vote for someone else just increases the chance of the worst of the two winning.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      It’s technically NOT a two party system. However the two major parties so dominate, that it’s rare for a third party candidate to get elected to any major office.

      I think the biggest difference is we’re not a parliamentary system that encourages coalitions. Whoever wins, wins.

      • Mirshe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        The bigger issue with third parties is that none of them actually bother to run anyone at a local or state level. If they started to grow their power and voting base normally, bottom-up, they’d have a lot more success than just sticking up a Presidential also-ran every 4 years and maybe a congressperson here or there.