• gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    So uh… as someone who works in biotech and understands exactly what level of rigor is required before the FDA allows you to sell a medical device - a term that has specific legal definition, regulations, and restrictions, I’m a bit suspicious this could be fake. This sort of error would indicate a systemic error and abrogation of due diligence at at least 4 different levels, and would be an apocalyptically huge lawsuit.

    Edit: I stand corrected - lots of people are corroborating this whole thing. That’s kind of astounding, tbh.

    • xalo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not fake. I’m a type 1 diabetic on this version of Omnipod and have noticed this before as well as other issues. I also had the app refuse to let me close an innocuous error modal window to activate a pod while I was in another country.

      While I love the hardware, the software feels precisely like it has been outsourced to a team with no knowledge of what T1 is and whoever internally is greenlighting the changes isn’t properly testing.

      The newest officially supported phone is the S21.

    • Laticauda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean they posted the steps to replicate it so it wouldn’t take long to debunk that sort of thing as being fake.

    • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      FDA requirements were the first thing that popped into my mind. Is it possible somehow these devices fall under different regulations than “medical devices”? I am only vaguely familiar with the applicable 21 CFR regs. This seems like a pretty gargantuan screw up since it could, I would think, kill people.