CDRMITTENS@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 years agotop textsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square13linkfedilinkarrow-up1244arrow-down137
arrow-up1207arrow-down1imagetop textsh.itjust.worksCDRMITTENS@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square13linkfedilink
minus-squareFisk400@feddit.nulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up37arrow-down1·2 years agoI mean, paying billions for things that will probably never be used in any meaningful capacity is not a foreign concept to the military. They do it all the time.
minus-squareikapoz@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24·2 years agoThat is literally the BEST case outcome for military spending.
minus-squareFermion@feddit.nlBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down1·2 years agoIt’s second best. The best is not paying and never needing it.
I mean, paying billions for things that will probably never be used in any meaningful capacity is not a foreign concept to the military. They do it all the time.
That is literally the BEST case outcome for military spending.
It’s second best. The best is not paying and never needing it.