downhomechunk@midwest.social to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agothis meme goes from acute to obtuse real quickmidwest.socialimagemessage-square15linkfedilinkarrow-up1590arrow-down111
arrow-up1579arrow-down1imagethis meme goes from acute to obtuse real quickmidwest.socialdownhomechunk@midwest.social to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square15linkfedilink
minus-squareKidplayer_666@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17arrow-down1·1 year agoAlso, all numbers are rational, otherwise they do not make sense
minus-squareTonyTonyChopper@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agowhat about the number whose square is -1
minus-squarenomecks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·1 year agoRoses are red, Euhler’s a hero, e^iπ+1=0
minus-squareaffiliate@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoas far as the rationals are concerned, this is the same as the number whose square is 2. (ℚ(i) and ℚ(√2) are isomorphic as fields.) what we can gleam from this is that complete rationality can blur the line between what’s real and what’s imaginary
minus-square⸻ Ban DHMO 🇦🇺 ⸻@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoSomeone needs to hit you with a dose of reality
Also, all numbers are rational, otherwise they do not make sense
what about the number whose square is -1
Roses are red, Euhler’s a hero, e^iπ+1=0
You’re just imagining it
as far as the rationals are concerned, this is the same as the number whose square is 2. (ℚ(i) and ℚ(√2) are isomorphic as fields.)
what we can gleam from this is that complete rationality can blur the line between what’s real and what’s imaginary
Someone needs to hit you with a dose of reality