• KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    If they’re interpretting ‘roguelite’ as single-session games with meta-progression between runs, then VS qualifies. I wouldn’t have called it a roguelite personally, but I can at least see where they got it from.

    • misk@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      VS has static levels and every enemy wave is predefined. On that merit alone it can’t be a roguelike/roguelite.

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I think I’ve seen VS (and games like it) called “bullet-heaven” since they’re kind of the opposite of bullet-hell in a way. I like that, since imo VS-type games are essentially a new genre separate from rogue-lites.

    • Toribor@corndog.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      What is Vampire Survivors lacking that would more firmly define it as a roguelike? Weapon pickups are randomized, each run is short but there is meta progression as you play. I’m not disagreeing I’m just not sure what the difference really is when compared to something like Hades.

      Edit: Saw another comment referencing the lack of level randomization so that makes sense.

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m not really sure how they are defining terms, but to me the reason vampire survivors shouldn’t be on the list is the live until x time gameplay. A rougelite or rougelike game should have a more definite win condition.