You don’t pay for those features, you pay less than the device would sell for without them because it’s a trade-off, sell for less but profit off features, that’s why the cheaper models have more bloat.
If these features wouldn’t be implemented in the first place, they would be even cheaper.
In the last about 5 years there was no innovation whatsoever in the TV market. Yet, there’s more and more bloat, more “smart” shit nobody needs and higher prices.
Because this is exactly the point of this entire post. There are no “simple” TVs that offer proper value propositions. You can’t simple TVs in that size range from a reputable source. You may find one from one of those allcaps Amazon brands, but that’s it.
You don’t pay for those features, you pay less than the device would sell for without them because it’s a trade-off, sell for less but profit off features, that’s why the cheaper models have more bloat.
If these features wouldn’t be implemented in the first place, they would be even cheaper.
In the last about 5 years there was no innovation whatsoever in the TV market. Yet, there’s more and more bloat, more “smart” shit nobody needs and higher prices.
No innovation? TVs have better picture quality every year and you pretend nothing’s changed in the last 5 years? 🤔
Where? 4k has been around for longer, OLED, HDR too.
QLED, QNED, MicroLED, 8k TVs, 120hz or more for gaming on big screens (and VRR), better HDR…
And you think that is the tech an average TV buyer wants?
It clearly is because people are buying them, not 65" 1080p TVs!
Can you buy them?
Because this is exactly the point of this entire post. There are no “simple” TVs that offer proper value propositions. You can’t simple TVs in that size range from a reputable source. You may find one from one of those allcaps Amazon brands, but that’s it.
Digital signage or big format computer monitors or projectors.