• DeathbringerThoctar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      When I started watching Harley Quinn I was like “They didn’t get Mark Hamill for the Joker?? This is a travesty!” But he does do a very good job with the role, and Clayface is just fun.

        • KnightontheSun@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          I agree wholeheartedly.

          When Bane went to Italy to fix the pasta maker I thoroughly enjoyed that entire story line.

          The writing on HQ is superb.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I love the show and it’s cool to see a relationship between two people of the same gender be portrayed as loving and a real partnership. I hope they never decide to do a breakup episode, even if they get back together by the end. I don’t think Harley and Ivy should ever stop loving each other.

        • KnightontheSun@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, I was very excited when King Shark spoke. I thought, “I know that voice and I love him!”

          First saw him in Powerless and very much enjoyed his onscreen persona.

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Too new, most people haven’t seen it. I’ve barely watched half a season of HQ and he’s not in it much.

      • KnightontheSun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        2019 was the start and I’ve happily watched all four seasons. A fifth season is on the way.

        I don’t know, but when I first caught it I loved it and have spread the word amongst my peers. I am older, so maybe I am out of touch with what the young folks are watching (my nephews have seen it). Alan Tudyk plays both Joker and Clayface. Joker is in it quite a bit, but they fade him out for a few reasons. Then he comes back.

        They also use so many other celebrity voices. You’ll think, “Hey, I know that voice!” Indeed you do. Ron Funches and Tony Hale are wonderful in their roles.

        So keep watching and you’ll see a lot more of him. That is, if you like the show. I think it’s excellent and well worth the time.

        -HQ fanboi

  • AngryHumanoid@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not against a “gangster” version of the Joker, because a lot of the Batman lore is about the different gangs of henchmen so the Joker is as much a gang leader as anyone else. AND I’ll go out and say he was not the worst thing in that movie… but yeah they could have done a lot better with the casting. But hey, still better than Eisen-Luthor!

    • Delphia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I like to think of it as “So close but so far”

      If it was just a little bit different in a lot of ways it could have been epic. I think the biggest thing that hamstrung it was the sheer lack of any origin grounding to explain the why of it.

  • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I would love to remember Suicide Squad fondly, but LA Joker ruined it for me. I can’t think about that movie without seeing his sick grill in my head.

  • Slow@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    The coolest image of the Joker in my ranking is the drawn Joker from this poster. In the old cartoon series, he most closely resembles the embodiment of evil and inadequacy.

  • Otkaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    While it might not be the most popular opinion, I personally appreciated Leto’s interpretation of the Joker. He’s no Heath Ledger, of course, but considering how often the character has been brought to life, I thought Leto’s performance was at least unique.

    • Tedesche@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      For me, it was too brief to even count as an interpretation. I don’t get how people can compare Leto’s performance to Ledger’s or Phoenix’s, simply because of how much more there is to the latter two’s, not even taking into account artistic quality or interpretation.

      • DragonTypeWyvern
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It was supposed to be a franchise. Honestly, it’s not like Leto was bad as the Joker, it’s his off screen antics and the rest of the movie being absolute trash that killed the reception.

        But I also don’t really mind Joker being a bit of a fuckboi. There are two perfect Jokers, Ledger and Hamill, and no one will be able to top them, so you might as well try something new.

    • Pinecone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      He’s not wrong. Leto joker turned a nuanced and intelligent villain into an edgy Facebook teen going through a phase. All the interesting subtlety washed out in place of “damaged” tattoos

      • DragonTypeWyvern
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Joker

        Nuanced and intelligent

        Okay, sure, we can pretend Ledger’s Joker is the only depiction of him ever.