griD@feddit.de to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agoWe've come a long way babyi.imgur.comexternal-linkmessage-square82linkfedilinkarrow-up11.63Karrow-down133 cross-posted to: programmer_humor@programming.dev
arrow-up11.6Karrow-down1external-linkWe've come a long way babyi.imgur.comgriD@feddit.de to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square82linkfedilink cross-posted to: programmer_humor@programming.dev
minus-squareSokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·2 years agoI’m out of the loop. What happened? Did someone decompile their code and find definitive proof of a throttle for Firefox?
minus-squaregriD@feddit.deOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·edit-22 years agosome explanation To be fair, they used setTimeout() and not thread.sleep() because the latter isn’t possible out of the box in JS ^^
minus-squareWild_Mastic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up14·edit-22 years ago Users who have ad blockers installed may experience suboptimal viewing Yeah let me turn off the adblocker just for having an even more suboptimal viewing due to ads. They’re lunatics.
minus-squareSynthead@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·2 years agoJavaScript is an interpreted language, so no decompilation is necessary, although this is repeatable by using a Firefox user agent.
minus-squareKogasa@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·2 years agoYou can build a virtual machine in JavaScript and execute compiled code on it
I’m out of the loop. What happened? Did someone decompile their code and find definitive proof of a throttle for Firefox?
some explanation
To be fair, they used setTimeout() and not thread.sleep() because the latter isn’t possible out of the box in JS ^^
Yeah let me turn off the adblocker just for having an even more suboptimal viewing due to ads. They’re lunatics.
JavaScript is an interpreted language, so no decompilation is necessary, although this is repeatable by using a Firefox user agent.
You can build a virtual machine in JavaScript and execute compiled code on it
Neat