UglyWanKanobi@alien.topB to Soccer (Closing)@soccer.forumEnglish · 2 years agoChelsea FC face new questions over how Roman Abramovich funded success | Roman Abramovichwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square117linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10cross-posted to: football@lemmy.world
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkChelsea FC face new questions over how Roman Abramovich funded success | Roman Abramovichwww.theguardian.comUglyWanKanobi@alien.topB to Soccer (Closing)@soccer.forumEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square117linkfedilinkcross-posted to: football@lemmy.world
minus-squareNotClayMerritt@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoThey can financially dope all they wish, but the players still have to perform, the manager still has to do a job. Money doesn’t buy competence or success.
minus-squareSpeechesToScreeches@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoYou could say the same for chemical doping…
minus-squareDiallingwand@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoIt clearly does. Believing that the wealthiest clubs aren’t consistently they most successful is denying reality.
They can financially dope all they wish, but the players still have to perform, the manager still has to do a job. Money doesn’t buy competence or success.
You could say the same for chemical doping…
It clearly does. Believing that the wealthiest clubs aren’t consistently they most successful is denying reality.