fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 年前Listen, Susan. It's a valid theory, just look at the damn thing.mander.xyzimagemessage-square50linkfedilinkarrow-up1747arrow-down134
arrow-up1713arrow-down1imageListen, Susan. It's a valid theory, just look at the damn thing.mander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 年前message-square50linkfedilink
minus-squarePrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·2 年前I’m obviously not getting this one lol
minus-squareDecoy321@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22·2 年前No need to overthink a meme, but here’s my guess. They’re correlating the shapes of the objects, implying some causation. There isn’t.
minus-squarePrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 年前Ahh okay, that makes more sense. Thanks!
minus-squarePrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 年前You could say that my formations have been rocked.
minus-squarelugal@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 年前Just be happy that you don’t get it. There are flat earthers out there who will say it unironically. Not sure if it’s only flat earthers but I think so. It really is wild
I’m obviously not getting this one lol
No need to overthink a meme, but here’s my guess.
They’re correlating the shapes of the objects, implying some causation.
There isn’t.
Ahh okay, that makes more sense. Thanks!
Are you stumped?
You could say that my formations have been rocked.
Just be happy that you don’t get it. There are flat earthers out there who will say it unironically. Not sure if it’s only flat earthers but I think so. It really is wild