I’m in a situation with my manager who is suggesting that clock-in starts when the employee arrives to the site of work. Effectively saying that everyone should be coming in 15 minutes earlier than their start time.

The majority of what I read online was about security checks when leaving the premises instead of entering. And the results of a couple class actions seem like the law has loose interpretation.

Wondering what your experiences have been like dealing with this situation. Are you paid for your time traveling on company premises?

For ref this takes place in California.

  • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As soon as you are doing the things that your company has ordered, you are working.

    This includes enduring the security check.

    • bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      2014 unanimous Supreme Court case says that they do not need to be paid. State law may require otherwise though. Believe there was a PA case recently that ruled they did need to be paid.

      • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Good question. Generally No.

        Your duty to come to work is part of your work contract. But not the question where you come from, or where you go after work. That’s your decision and your private time.

        If it is different, for example if they order you where to live, then that must be compensated.