Ohio voters just took firm positions on abortion and reproductive rights and adult-use recreational marijuana Tuesday, but gerrymandered Ohio lawmakers are already planning to flout, ignore, challenge, and abuse the voters’ wishes. This is what gerrymandering brings. This is why it’s a fundamental poison in the lifeblood of our republic.

Mere hours after Ohio voters passed the Issue 1 reproductive rights amendment with 56.62%, according to unofficial results, and the Issue 2 recreational marijuana law with 57% (both getting nearly 2.2 million votes), Ohio Republican legislative leaders signaled they would not respect the will of the people.

  • Salamendacious@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Protesting without voting is just taking a loud walk. It’s easy for politicians to ignore you if you don’t ever show up at the polls. That would be like a bunch of people protesting outside a McDonald’s because the food is unhealthy and then eating at that McDonald’s for their lunch break. Definitely protest but back that protesting up with voting.

    • angrystego@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, I never meant protesting without voting. In this case people DID vote. But their decision is being ignored. I don’t think the reasonable thing to do in such case is to wait peacefully for another election!

    • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Protesting without voting is just taking a loud walk.

      My dawg WE DID VOTE. I VOTED. I VOTED FOR BOTH OF THE ISSUES IN THIS POST AND THE PARTY IN POWER IS STILL SAYING FUCK YOU.

      Sorry for the all caps but like, c’mon guy, do you think people aren’t voting? We fucking voted! We did it! We did the thing people have always told us to do and the Republicans are still getting their way! Just voting isn’t cutting it anymore! Stop telling people just to vote, and stop belitting other valid forms that the voting populace can use to enact change!

      • Salamendacious@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        People vote once and a while. In the 2020 presidential election voter turn out spiked. The 2022 midterm though? 46%

        You want to protest? Go for it.

        You want to scream in all caps? Go for it

        You want to say “fuck the fascists” or talk about what you’ll do to them? Go for it

        Do whatever you want. As long as one of the things you do is vote.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s easy for politicians to ignore you if you don’t ever show up at the polls.

      It’s much easier if you ONLY show the at the polls and only for them no matter what.

      • Salamendacious@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s why you have to vote in the primary. AOC should have taught you that. Also, did you happen to see the last sentence in that previous comment?

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s why you have to vote in the primary

          The primary controlled by the very party actively fighting progressives. The party that argued in court that selecting the candidate themselves is within their rights? Yeah, that’s a fair contest for sure 🙄

          • Salamendacious@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re so incredibly pessimistic. Then how did Ocasio-Cortez beat Crowley in 2018? He had been in Congress for twenty years and was the chair of the House Democratic Caucus! If “the party” controlled the primary why would they “let” her win? The only way things can ever get better is by voting.

            • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Then how did Ocasio-Cortez beat Crowley

              A rare and momentous triumph. That someone exceptional like AOC with an exceptional grassroots organisation behind her can do it once doesn’t mean that it’s easy or even, in most cases, possible for others.

              The only way things can ever get better is by voting.

              Odd thing to keep repeating on a post about people betrayed by the very people you advocate voting for as “the only way” 🙄

              • Salamendacious@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Wait first it was:

                The primary controlled by the very party actively fighting progressives.

                Then it became:

                A rare and momentous triumph.

                Does “the party” determine the primary or do the voters? It’s one or the other.

                • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It was a rare and momentous triumph for AOC to win a primary that was controlled by the very people actively fighting progressives.

                  Which part don’t you understand?

                  • Salamendacious@lemmy.worldOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    If the party controlled the primary then Crowley would have won. I don’t like arguments where everything is X but if Y happens that just proves X. I see it as flawed logic.