• maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Word from insiders communicating openly about it was that it wasn’t going to happen for the same reasons behind this soft end of life: there wasn’t profit in it and they needed to find profitability.

    Word was that the project to federate was internally put in a “too hard let’s try later” basket. Of course none of that was made public. But this life support status is really just the other shoe from the broken federation promise.

    Interestingly, I suspect there’s a conversation to be had around how difficult it is to federate with the fediverse and AP, whether from the ground up or as an add on. I’ve seen conversations about how it really is difficult work. If it were easier, maybe things like tumblr would have done it earlier and the fediverse and it’s various platforms would be richer and more successful.

    • PeleSpirit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      like tumblr would have done it earlier and the fediverse and it’s various platforms would be richer and more successful.

      Meh, it’s harder for a for-profit company but not hard for the DIY people. I’m cool with that, it’s rich enough and getting richer.

        • PeleSpirit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Do you mean being attacked by outsiders? Reddit was down a significant amount of time and they had tons of resources. We’re doing okay and everyone powers through.

          • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, just the work of building the federation part of a platform.

            Look at both mastodon and Lemmy, both have a huge blind spot for a major part of the ActivityPub protocol. Mastodon doesn’t manage groups well and Lemmy doesn’t manage users well, as content creating actors that is. This is obviously by design to a large extent, but the difficulty of expanding the bounds of a platform to include more of the spec seems to clearly be part of the problem.

            • PeleSpirit@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Part of what problem? It would be nice if we could all communicate easily but it’s not really a problem. Just like twitter and facebook not really communicating isn’t a problem. If they decide to blend them, cool. If not, that’s cool too.

              • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Part of what problem?

                That platforms struggle to interact with each other more than the promise of the fediverse implies.

                Segregated platforms is a hang over from competitive big social. It’s all just text messages in the end as webpages are all just HTML. Part of the promise of the fediverse is to break down these capitalistic walls. If it’s too hard to engineer though, then the promise may need some rethinking.