fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agobro plsmander.xyzimagemessage-square203fedilinkarrow-up11.68Karrow-down184
arrow-up11.6Karrow-down1imagebro plsmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square203fedilink
minus-squarearin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up53arrow-down3·1 year agoUpkeep might be expensive, but 22 billion is probably lower bound estimation, highly likely to 5x that at least
minus-squareCheeseNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27·edit-21 year agoPff the UK is spending that on a 70 mile railway thats going to be slower than the one already there, already spent nearly 2x the projected FCC budget on just 6 miles of the fucking thing.
minus-squarefrezik@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22·1 year agoMaybe the government should spend less on avocado toast.
Upkeep might be expensive, but 22 billion is probably lower bound estimation, highly likely to 5x that at least
Pff the UK is spending that on a 70 mile railway thats going to be slower than the one already there, already spent nearly 2x the projected FCC budget on just 6 miles of the fucking thing.
Maybe the government should spend less on avocado toast.