Given that racists and slavers used the “natural physical strength” of black people to justify putting them on hard labor and some medics still think that blacks has higher resistance to pain, I wonder if when black athletes started to join mixed race sport teams, some racist would have used the same “biological advantage” argument that now transphobes use against trans athletes to claim it was “unfair” for black to compete against whites to justify segregation.

    • vis4valentine@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      49
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, that is true until you are 2+ years on estrogen and testosterone blockers, then your advantages go away.

      • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        56
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Your still have a bone, ligament and muscle structure that developed under testosterone, I don’t think that just “goes away” once you remove the hormones that brought it on in the first place.

        • somethingsnappy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Thank the tiny gods, or I would be spherical with no muscles at this point. Muscle and the resilience of connecting tissue takes a very long time to atrophy.

        • krashmo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I mean, none of the trans people I’ve met are people I would describe as natural athletes. I’m sure they exist but there doesn’t seem to be a whole lot of overlap in the two categories which likely skews any sort of analysis of the subject.

          • Serinus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            The issue is that exceptional people win. And you can’t allow people to compete, but then tell them it’s not okay if they win.

            I’m cool with anyone competing in men’s competitions, but sports set aside for women at birth should keep that standard. The same logic applies to Oscar Pistorius, who shouldn’t have been allowed to compete in the Olympics. If you win a competition with artificial legs, it’s hard to argue that the artificial legs aren’t an advantage.

          • CherenkovBlue@iusearchlinux.fyi
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Women’s cycling races in Chicago area would tell a different story…along with women’s swimming (Lia Thomas)…and other cases.

      • ridethisbike@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Genuinely curious on this, so don’t take offense when I ask for a source. I’m gonna Google it, too, but it would be helpful for others if it’s posted up.

      • Gigan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even if that were true, I don’t think 100% of sporting organizations require 2+ years of hormone treatment before they allow trans athletes to compete.