• LoopedNetwork@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    173
    ·
    11 months ago

    “Meta declined to comment on whether subscribers’ data would be used for anything other than ads.”

    Not answering is an answer.

    • maxprime@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Yeah the headline is dead wrong. Privacy ≠ ad free.

      That said, paying for a service is the one solution to getting rid of ads that I can see working in general. In general I don’t see this as a bad thing.

      • Magister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        11 months ago

        Absolutely, the $10/month is just to disable ads, like if you are running a free uBlock. Meta will still collect all your data from every cookies/sites and sell all your info to 3rd party for $$$.

        • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          They’ve already been found guilty of illegally tracking users in the EU and are facing insanely high fines - this is supposed to be their response to that - it’s supposed to be a viable business model that doesn’t involve tracking.

          If they’re still tracking people even after doing something about it - there will be zero leniency given.

    • lobut@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      There’s so little doubt that they’re still using and selling user data no matter what they claim.

      • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        Same here. I read about FB in some tech magazine, and thought something along the lines of: “You always use a nickname when interacting with people in online forums, because that’s just normal internet etiquette. Why would anyone want to share their real name and face on the internet?”

        Oh, boy was I in for a surprise when a few years later everyone and even their pets had FB accounts.

    • TheMurphy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      This is basically just hard greed.

      They profit so well on your stolen data, and they won’t no where near need the money from this subscription.

      That said, I’m glad they are doing it. Hopefully it will drive people to some other less money hungry alternative.

      Facebook only has succes as long as enough people are using it. Otherwise I would rather contact people anywhere else.

  • AMillionNames@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    Hopefully large social networks have not metastasized enough to prevent their death with this. I hope that they also decide to bully through this bullshit onto WhatsApp, which is heavily used throughout the EU, thus ensuring their death is even quicker. They’ve tried to copy Google Premium, but Google gives you the option to disable personalized data collections and ad serving.

    • maxprime@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      11 months ago

      Who said anything about your data not being tracked and sold still?

      That’s the approximate price meta gets paid just for serving the ad. I would imagine your data is worth much more than that.

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Exactly that’s just the ad price for the data. Analytics, internal use and whatnot is a whole different thing.

  • OGC@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Can’t we just use ad-blocks to make it as-free? 😂

    • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’d posit that you get even more protections by aggressively blocking all 3rd party tracking and cookies via ad-blocks because you’re not a datapoint in Facebook as “someone who would give money to facebook.”

  • popemichael@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Everyone should be using the Facebook addon “Facebook Purity” if they are still using the platform. I’ve been using it for over a decade and I can’t stand using Facebook without it…

    Not only does it work better than most adblocks, but you can completely move, remove, and restyle features.

    It’s the only way of working with that platform is not harmful to one’s sanity.

    • Raltoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      The only people using Facebook these days either don’t know what addons/extentions are, or they are forced to use it through work/business.