• @corship@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    1258 months ago

    Well because here you can get treatment for your mental and physical illness without ending up in debt for the rest of your life

      • @Lyricism6055@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        338 months ago

        Was in a deep depression. I have good Healthcare and tried to make an appt with a psychiatrist to take care of it.

        6 month waiting list… I thought US Healthcare was supposed to be better than this?

        Still cost me $300 when I finally got in too since it’s a specialist… Fml

      • @MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        208 months ago

        It’s also a nightmare in much of the US if you are not rich or happen to have excellent insurance. Having to wait six months to receive a bill you can’t afford isn’t great.

        • @IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          148 months ago

          Agreed. I’m just pointing out that it’s not lack of access to mental health services that’s preventing gun deaths in the UK, it’s lack of access to guns.

      • @LazyBane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        38 months ago

        I couldn’t leave the house for 5 years becuase I was terrified of people, and when I finally went to see a GP for help all I got was “well I can’t sell you a pill to fix it so I’m not going to do anything”.

    • @Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      17
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Hahahahaha! Mental illness treatment? In Canada? Got insurance to cover that or years to wait?

      This part is no better than the USA (and surprise surprise, it’s mostly privatized!)

    • @Smokeydope@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      08 months ago

      The best and cheapest possible treatment you can get here for mental illness is the kind you grow on your own sadly 🍄

  • @Mo5560@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    718 months ago

    The German police uses less bullets every year than the average policeman in the US.

    Yes you read that right, the entire German police, all of them.

  • @YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    498 months ago

    The UK and Canada have similar occurrences, but not in the vast number as the United States. We all understand the access to firearms is the problem.

  • @letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    42
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I don’t think it’s a mental health problem per se - I think American society is sick.

    And I don’t mean sick as in “something happened to you all” - I mean sick as in “you all willingly participate in it together”

    There are plenty of other countries with guns who don’t have the same kinds of mass killings the USA does.

    The problem as I see it is that so many Americans are just so fucking emotional about everything.

    Everything’s a drama, or a story that needs to be be told, of a journey, or an underdog, or revenge, or a protector. Are musical montage. “I just have to tell you where I have come from” - “you just need ro know my roots”

    Every disagreement is a fascist or a communist.

    Nothing just “is”.

    Everything has to have bullshit emotional content and context.

    The trouble is none of you will ever see yourselves as part of the problem.

    You’re in a narcissistic trap.

    Liberals are 100% certain that “it’s the guns” and get absolutely high saying it.

    But it’s not the guns. Canada has guns.

    Loads of other countries have guns.

    You’re all fucking hysterical.

    • ASeriesOfPoorChoices
      link
      fedilink
      248 months ago

      TL;DR: it is the guns, but it isn’t just the guns. It isn’t any one thing and it isn’t not any one thing.


      1. it IS the guns. It’s hard / difficult to massacre with knives.

      2. it IS mental health too.

      Canada, Australia, UK, etc have horrifically underfunded and backed up mental health care systems - but yes, still far better than anything in the USA.

      1. Canada has guns. Australia has guns. Neither has as many guns as the USA. Neither is as easy or cheap or widely available as in the USA. Restricting guns is what actually happens and is meant by your imaginary liberals and guns. They don’t mean that farmers shouldn’t have guns - they know that as a tool, they’re useful. I’m not saying hyperbole isn’t used (which pisses me off as much as you). But what I am saying is they’re right. It’s the guns. It’s the amount of guns. It’s the types of guns.

      Which brings me to:

      1. using words like “hysterical” doesn’t help. It’s misleading, and plain wrong.

      And yeah, I’ve gone off from your main point of “the USA is too emotionally extreme”. This is… not wrong, but I want to argue overly simplistic. I (and others) have described the USA not as one country, but 50 or so (I’m not sold on the Dakota twins) countries that are loosely bound by their xenophobia of everyone else more than anything else. The country wasn’t founded on a love of the USA, but the hatred of the UK.

      I mean, the UK isn’t really that much different. Remember Northern Ireland and Great Britain? Scotland and England? If they had guns like the USA had guns… woo.

      So, America being a drama, etc? You’re not wrong. It’s an ideology that was instilled at birth, and raised by capitalism - money from engagement, and emotionally trapped people are engaged. It’s a society/system created, used and trapped by itself.

      And guns are what turns that bubbling cauldron into massacres.

      And massacres make the emotional drama cauldron bubble more.

      Get rid of guns, you get rid of a lot of stress and drama. You don’t solve all problems, but you solve one that is repeating and feeding the drama machine.

      Sell the guns to South America/ Israel / wherever they want to ruin next, and use the money to fund affordable housing or something. Solved two birds with one stone!

      PS: I’d love to see the USA fundamentally change in one big way: a stronger, standardised federal government. For example, let states do state elections however they want. But if you’re voting in a federal election, it should be the same forms, same design, same level of access everywhere in the country. If you can drive freely between states, driving rules and tests should be standardised (they basically are, rural vs city aside). Education? Anything which affects and creates a level playing field across the country, ie. federally, should be standardized. If a state wants to charge sales tax, and another doesn’t - that’s fine! That’s local.

      In the same vein, remove weird voted-in positions, like judges and sheriffs. Emotional, populist,partisan involvement in roles that are supposed to be neutral and balanced is insane.

      And the guns aren’t helping.

      • @Chee_Koala@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        18 months ago

        Man, voted in positions sound so reasonable and logical and democratic, it’s a real bummer it doesn’t work in our current systems. You just end up introducing marketing to everything, ugh.

        • ASeriesOfPoorChoices
          link
          fedilink
          18 months ago

          It is completely unreasonable in every respect.

          Positions should be based on merit, not money (advertising) and popularity. Judges and sheriffs have to make judgement calls all the time, and I’d prefer to have people with experience and without bias (as much as possible), instead of bought and paid for. Also, accountable to the system, not just the next election.

          I am very much oversimplifying it, and skipping some issues, such as other existing systemic problems - but in short: what’s popular is not always right. Like mobs.

      • @Kedly@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        18 months ago

        Damn, this should be copied and pasted to everyone arguing its not guns, you’ve covered basically ALL of the talking points incredibly well

      • @letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        -58 months ago

        Look, I don’t think it’s merely about mental health spend either.

        I genuinely think that Americans are not very laid back.

        It’s mir magic - some nations are more laid back than others.

        You say the word “hysterical” doesn’t help.

        But it’s what you need to hear.

        Everything has to be coated with so much sugar you all get fat and the meaning is lost.

        Yeah. That’s what’s it is. You’re just all always looking for drama and shit to get upset about.

        It’s not more complicated than that. It doesn’t need everyone to sit down and get to therapy or make a TV show show about your pain.

        It’s just that you’re all always looking for drama.

        • @TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          38 months ago

          You are simply describing the effects of political and social polarization. I blame it primarily on a decades-long process of consolidation of wealth, influence and opportunity in the hands of an elite few, but no doubt there are other factors at play as well.

          On the flipside I am very much opposed to any theory of the case that has it as being somehow uniquely American. It’s not an American thing; it’s a human thing that can happen in any country and has in fact happened in many countries throughout history. It does not require that we posit some kind of national hysteria that’s unique to Americans when we can, with far fewer assumptions, simply point to polarization.

          • @letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            08 months ago

            Polarisation isn’t that bad in Europe. We take things in our stride better.

            We’re not constantly freaking out over tiny things.

            America seems neurotic.

            • @TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
              link
              fedilink
              English
              28 months ago

              Yes, polarization is the relevant factor, as I said. What part about this do you not understand?

              It’s not as if Europe has a great record in this sense either. One look at the last century tells us everything we need to know about how susceptible European populations are to polarization.

            • ASeriesOfPoorChoices
              link
              fedilink
              18 months ago

              Polarisation is absolutely that bad or worse in Europe. Poland and the UK are two good examples.

              Oh, and holy shit, Germany, etc. with lockdowns and such with covid. They went nuts.

              Oh, and how about riots in France every year? Come on. For a relatively small country, they flip out and set fire to things WAY more often than the USA does.

    • @Deuces@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      178 months ago

      Youre not entirely wrong, but I gotta say how funny it is to see a post complaining about how everyone blows each other’s positions way up fisish by saying American liberals want to take away all guns. I’m sure you can find an American liberal that says that, but they’re in a massive minority. Most of us would be very happy with Canada’s level of gun control. You have to take a gun safety class and pass a safty test for any gun, with an extra class and test and a license for hand guns and assault rifles.

      Canada also has a system for helping people with mental health problems that doesn’t bankrupt the person.

      Im pretty sure that’s exactly what the Democrats have been asking for for the last 30 odd years.

      • @Rakonat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        68 months ago

        As an American who’s about as progun as you can get and still think the government has a responsibility to tax its wealthiest citizens and keep it’s poorest out of poverty, I’d welcome the same level of gun control as we apply to owning motor vehicles: license programs to ensure everyone who can legal own/operate one is familiar with safe use, practice and undergone a bare minimum level of mental evaluation so that a psycopath or sociopatn can’t just have a bad day to turn it on the general public. It would be a tough pill to swallow for some gun owners but if it was paired with removing a lot of the baseless restrictions (looking at you California compliant) with regular requirements such as yearly renewals and checkups with the ability for referrals to be made if a person starts acting in a way they could become a danger and law enforcement required to act upon it or face immediate termination if they were found to ignore it.

        Combine that with single payer/universal healthcare with a comprehensive mental health for every citizen and it could lead to better diagnosing people suffering from conditions that could make them a threat to public safety and get them treatment that would hopefully help them live and not suffer from such conditions to say nothing of lower the chances for these violent outbursts.

        Its a fantasy, yes I know. But the current system clearly doesn’t work, and prohibition and war on drugs has shown repeatedly that restricting everyone to stop the minority of abusers only makes a massive underground/black market for such things that actually makes it easier to people to abuse them in ways that are more difficult to track and prevent. I’d rather try to make the fantasy work than pursue a method I know is only goin to have short term benefits and long term problems.

      • @letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        -38 months ago

        Yeah but there are lots of people saying it’s the guns (literally in this thread) - that’s basically what the OP is about. But even then the right wing acting like scared little babies about it too.

        It’s just everything is turned up to 11 with you lot.

        All the fucking time.

        • @OrangeJoe@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Says the person who wrote a comment filled with hyperbole and points taken to their extremes.

            • @OrangeJoe@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              3
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              You use the word everything a lot and phrases like “you’re all”. That’s hyperbole. You can’t possibly know what all 330+ million people think or how everyone acts and are likely basing your views off what you see on social media or in the news, not real life.

    • GladiusB
      link
      fedilink
      58 months ago

      Insert Fight Club quotes. We’ve known for years. The American Dream is consumed by everyone from everywhere and when it doesn’t come true, no one knows what to do.

        • GladiusB
          link
          fedilink
          28 months ago

          Meh. Many other people from many other countries believed it. I hear ya. It’s apt for today. But it didn’t used to be that way

    • Cosmic Cleric
      link
      fedilink
      English
      58 months ago

      Everything’s a drama, or a story that needs to be be told

      Well you should ask yourself if you’re an outsider looking in through the lens of our media.

      Because if you are, and you see us through our media, our media is very focus on profit generation, and gives a very ‘two sides fighting’ view of everything that is America, as that drives viewership and profits the most.

      • @letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        28 months ago

        It’s from when I actually meet you lot. I won’t even date Americans now in my city - it’s just always some drama.

        I’m sure not all Americans are like that and I’ve worked with some really cool ones - no doubt, but there’s definitely a culture of emotional drama that contributes to an unhealthy greater society.

        • Cosmic Cleric
          link
          fedilink
          English
          28 months ago

          It’s from when I actually meet you lot.

          It’s a lot of Americans to have met to make a blanket statement like you did though.

          I’m sure not all Americans are like that and I’ve worked with some really cool ones - no doubt, but there’s definitely a culture of emotional drama that contributes to an unhealthy greater society.

          Well one thing to understand about America is there’s multiple/many cultures, not just one, and it depends on what region of the country you’re viewing. And then on top of that there’s two or three meta cultures.

          Also, you’re not catching us at our best right now, we are pretty angry at each other here over politics right now, so try to consider that as well.

          No one is perfect 100% of the time.

        • ASeriesOfPoorChoices
          link
          fedilink
          18 months ago

          Americans you meet

          You’ll find there’s a huge difference in attitude between what I call tourists and travellers.

          Immigrants and expats too.

          (In Americans outside of the USA)

    • Cosmic Cleric
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I mean sick as in “you all willingly participate in it together”

      Not to detract from your well written comment, but there is something of a disconnect between the will of the populace and those who enact the laws.

      • @letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        18 months ago

        I’m not talking about the laws. I’m talking about personality wise, you’re all so bloody emotional and feel everything is some important story or drama.

        • Cosmic Cleric
          link
          fedilink
          English
          28 months ago

          Well I’m describing the reasons why people may get “emotional and feel everything is some important story or drama”.

  • @bi_tux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    318 months ago

    On the other hand, guns don’t kill a lot of people in most european countries (even the ones with very little gun control)

      • @bi_tux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        178 months ago

        I mean sure, the US has almost no gun control, but in austria for example you don’t even need a permit for a lot of lethal weapons.

        I think it’s really a culture problem, but that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t regulate guns a bit

        • @RaoulDook@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          68 months ago

          There are mountains of gun control laws in the USA. Saying the USA “has almost no gun control” is ridiculous.

            • @RaoulDook@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              08 months ago

              Yep that that will always be the case, regardless of what the law says. There is no way to enforce background checks on private sales without 24/7 video monitoring and analysis on every person, just like any other form of prohibition that doesn’t work.

        • @PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          It doesn’t matter how permissive their gun laws are, nor how few mass shootings they have under them – they have gun laws that are broadly agreed to be safe for the public.

          This is true for every country in the world except America.

          It doesn’t matter if they are more permissive because their “culture” is less bloodthirsty or because their mental healthcare is better or they banned video games and doors. They have the social risk under control.

          When it turns out they don’t have the risks under control, such as following mass shootings in Australia and New Zealand, they change the laws.

          They even loosen those laws occasionally to make things like hobby shooting at ranges more accessible.

          None of that for America though! No matter how great the risks of their gun laws grow, no matter how clearly inappropriate they are for the current state of American society, the gun lobby demands that laws only get more dogshit.

          So Republicans make it happen for $16 million a year and the pro-gun crowd cheer them on because they don’t want to be mildly inconvenienced to save the lives of people they don’t give a shit about.

          • @Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            -28 months ago

            they have gun laws that are broadly agreed to be safe for the public.

            This is true for every country in the world except America.

            So clearly you don’t know about current gun laws in the US. You must be willfully ignorant to think that America does not have gun laws that are broadly accepted by the public

            • @PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              08 months ago

              “Broadly agreed to be safe for the public” isn’t the same thing as “broadly accepted by the public” but sure, I guess all the mass shootings, armed criminals and child suicides are just because you’ve made everyone so damn safe

                • @PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  08 months ago

                  So clearly you don’t know about current gun laws in the US. You must be willfully ignorant to think that America does not have gun laws that are broadly accepted by the public

                  It’s literally exactly what you said, verbatim. Are we really supposed to trust you with guns and gun laws?

        • qyron
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          The US has a very strange and, in my view, troubled relationship with guns.

          What transpires out is that most americans are still attached to the notion of solving problems at gun point and delivering justice through acute lead poisoning, like in the initial settling and further expansion of the country, with no care nor concern for rule of law.

          • Jeremy [Iowa]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            08 months ago

            If that were the case, you’d be able to point to a significant amount of daily firearm violence - above and beyond every other form of violence.

      • @uis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Finland, Ukraine(not including war). In some way Russia, where even if you don’t want, good unkle Voenkom will give you gun anyway.

      • Jeremy [Iowa]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        08 months ago

        I’m not sure how you’d argue a background check and being of age at a minimum as a lack of firearm control.

    • Which European countries have very little gun control? I wasn’t aware of any european country in which anyone can just carry a loaded gun around in public for no reason.

  • @erasebegin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    318 months ago

    well… it is a mental health problem. Plus culture. Switzerland has guns and just as many people with mental health problems as the rest of the ‘developed’ world, but almost 0 shootings.

  • @doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    258 months ago

    Call it a mental health problem, a societal health problem, whatever. Unless we accept that wanting to slaughter the people around you is an unfixable natural quirk of some people’s human experience, then this cannot be purely a gun control issue.

    • @PutangInaMo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      58 months ago

      This shit is a recent phenomena and I asked myself what changed since the 90s? That’s when this shit really started popping off…

      Only thing I can think of is access to the internet. Before that, struggling kids were benign by themselves. But now they have open access to others like them, and they can foment together. Throw in copy cat behavior and access to guns, that’s the recipe.

    • @PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      48 months ago

      Sounds good.

      The gun control crowd can stop mass murderers, criminals and domestic abusers from buying legal, semi-automatic weapons (as well as dumbshit gun owners leaving unsecured firearms around to be stolen or used in their childs suicide).

      This will keep everyone much safer while the pro-gun crowd get to work on curing every mental health issue forever, fixing wealth inequality, banning video games and schools with too many doors and whatever other things they think are the root of the problem.

      Until they do, indiscriminately selling guns to people clearly isn’t working.

    • @Kedly@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      28 months ago

      The fact that you keep arguing how much of a gun control issue it is amongst other contributing factors is almost as big if the reason as the lack of gun control. Its been more than 20 years since Columbine, grow the fuck up and start doing something, WHICH INCLUDES gun control

  • @Harpsist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    218 months ago

    It’s not even like Canada even gives a shit about mental health.

    Apparently the Ontario prime minister had heard a out how much people were suffering post pandemic - - - and then cut funding to the point that people could only get 10 sessions with a consoler (not even a psychologist or anything special!)

    • @phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      18 months ago

      One only needs to walk around some neighborhoods in Vancouver (hello, Hastings!) to see how much Canada cares about mental healthcare

      • Cosmic Cleric
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -18 months ago

        see how much Canada cares about mental healthcare

        Canada, or anywhere else, people do care about mental health care, at least until they have to pay more taxes to take care of it.

        • @phoenixz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          18 months ago

          I love on Vancouver and it’s very visible here how much people care about mental healthcare

  • It can be surprisingly difficult to get a therapist in the US if you don’t have insurance. Honestly, I found the process remarkably frustrating even with insurance.

    I don’t know what it’s like in the other countries listed, but they all have much better healthcare systems than the US, so I imagine it’s much easier.

    • Franzia
      link
      fedilink
      18 months ago

      Genuinely.

      Have the best insurance - Want a therapist in two weeks? It’ll be a one hour long phone call.

      Want in person? Join a month + waiting list

      Dont have the right insurance? Fuck off or pay $200 cash.

      And thats for the basic Talk Therapy or if you’re lucky Cognitive Behavioral Therapy route. Want a specialist for a specific issue? Waiting list.

      I advocate for books - you can get the therapy + mindfulness setup from a CBT Book for Depression/Anxiety and 10℅ Happier or Eckhart Tolle. Videos are great these days, even Tiktok sometimes. I think HealthyGamer has the best vids.

  • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    158 months ago

    Well there is another thing they all have in common…

    They’re all dirty commies! At least that’s what Fox News told me.

  • @badbytes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    148 months ago

    Running statistical analysis on the data now. Preliminary results suggest video games as the main causal effect.

  • @crackajack@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    108 months ago

    I always say that this is more cultural than anything else. Americans tend to be more gung ho and are ammosexuals who worship guns excessively. The Swiss have more guns per capita, they are legally mandated to own guns, but they have practically zero mass shootings unlike the US. I’m not deriding American people themselves, I’m just criticising how they handle and view guns. They can do whatever the heck they want, it’s their prerogative, but if one’s rights end with another then that’s going to be an issue. Just relax with the guns and emulate their Swiss brethrens who are self-disciplined about handling guns. Rights come with responsibilities.

    • @killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      38 months ago

      I don’t think you mean it to be, but everything you’re saying is total bollocks.

      https://prateekdasgupta1.medium.com/stop-comparing-american-gun-culture-with-switzerland-if-you-are-not-willing-to-do-what-the-swiss-do-e3e765189d15

      Particularly the part about guns per capita

      The Swiss aren’t perfect, mind. They didn’t let women vote until the 70s ffs. My point being that these kinds of comparisons simply don’t work. The US has a unique problem. But the problem is still solvable through gun control, because gun control can pervade culture, as demonstrated by many other countries.

      • @HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        48 months ago

        So, there’s a problem with those statistics; they’re looking at civilian arms per capita. In Switzerland, a large number of the firearms that are in ‘civilians’ hands are military arms. The Swiss–in general–have to serve a term in the military as conscripts, and then have the option of taking their issued rifle home with them. That’s not a “civilian” weapon though. I strongly suspect that once you account for the assault weapons–real, select-fire assault weapons, not assault-style firearms–that the numbers go up sharply. Likely not to American levels. But much higher than they are listed.

        • @killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 months ago

          Those rifles are transferred to civilian ownership once they are discharged from the military.

          Happy to see a source that says otherwise but it’s illogical that because you previously served your gun is somehow “still in the military”. Especially given that virtually anyone is free to own a gun once they’ve discharged.

          • @HelixDab2@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            18 months ago

            Up until recently, you were given a block of ammunition for the gun that you were supposed to keep sealed in case of the militia being called up. So you were given gov’t ammunition for a civilian weapon? IDK.

            It seems like the numbers are getting fudged somewhere, partly because the Swiss don’t keep any kind of official records. I saw one claim that put the number at roughly double the one cited, so…?

          • @HelixDab2@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            18 months ago

            Yay! I get to be above average in at least one thing!

            Seriously though - the numbers and averages don’t really give a good picture of gun ownership in the US. Something like 40-ish% of US households have at least one firearm. But then somewhere around 1-5% of people in the US have something like 50% of all of the guns in the US (I’m pulling these numbers out of my ass, but it’s pretty stark). If you get into competitive shooting, it ends up being really easy to have a lot of guns. So while the average might be 1.5, lots of people have no firearms at all, and a relatively small number of people have, like 20 each.

      • Polar
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        So most countries have 70% less guns, but 100% less shootings.

        Math still doesn’t math.

      • @crackajack@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        08 months ago

        Huh, it must have been an outdated info that Switzerland has the most guns per capita. But still, they have large amounts of guns per person nonethless and yet very virtually no mass shooting.

        As an aside, the Swiss women’s suffrage is constantly brought up as Switzerland not being democratic and being late in the modern world. I’m not trying to justify it, but that is always misconceived. Every Swiss canton in 90s but one kept rejecting the women’s suffrage in their local referendums, because that canton is overwhelmingly populated by couple of hundreds of old rural people stuck in their ways. It took the Swiss Supreme Court to force that canton to finally allow women to vote. Because of that one canton, everyone outside of Switzerland thought the entire country did not allow women to vote until the 90s, which gave the country a bad historical reputation and myth.

        • @killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          What I said isn’t a myth though. They weren’t allowed to vote until the 70s. All suffrage movements start and end somewhere and there’s ended later than most in Europe. Over 50% of men in Switzerland voted against women voting just ten years prior to them getting it.

          Which lends exactly to my point: if we’re to pick something to judge Switzerland by, it’s something like that. Not misinformation about guns per capita.

          • @crackajack@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            -18 months ago

            Like I said, it is just one canton. People make it as though the entirety of Switzerland did not allow women to vote until the 90s when it is just one canton. It is essentially a myth. I’m not defending what happened, I’m saying it is a misconception and a myth at best.

            • @killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              28 months ago

              An earlier referendum on women’s suffrage was held on 1 February 1959 and was rejected by the majority (67%) of Switzerland’s men

              This isn’t a myth and saying “it’s one canton” doesn’t absolve the people who voted overwhelmingly against women being able to vote.

              The result is right here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1959_Swiss_referendums#:~:text=The first was held on,approved by 62%25 of voters.

              I just can’t figure out for the life of me why you want to defend this or keep calling it a myth.

              • @crackajack@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                -1
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Oh you’re talking about the 70s. Most people talk about the 90s when that one Swiss canton still did not allow women to vote on federal level, making as though entirety of Switzerland did not allow women to vote until the year 1990.

                But sorry to be pedantic (and I am being one because I am a historical nerd and annoyed by perpetuation of historical myths), but it is Liechtenstein which is the last European country not to have allowed women to vote until 1984, not Switzerland.

      • Jeremy [Iowa]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -18 months ago

        But the problem is still solvable through gun control, because gun control can pervade culture, as demonstrated by many other countries.

        How likely do you believe it is to bring about the constitutional amendment necessary to ban firearms? To gain support of 2/3s the states in addition to a 2/3 majority in Congress?

        That aside, you could argue symptoms could be addressed through such extremes if it were possible to do so, but you couldn’t argue such measures address underlying issues - solve problems.

        • @killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 months ago

          Yeah I’m not arguing for a ban, not even for the reasons of political support; it’s simply unworkable due to the “genie being out the bottle”.

    • Jeremy [Iowa]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      18 months ago

      ammosexuals

      Ah, I see we’re using conservative tactics in making an “other” group demonize and alienate.

      I always say that this is more cultural than anything else.

      In the sense that culture is a complete lack of social safety nets, affordable and accessible healthcare and community support resources, broken ERPO laws, etc., sure.

      You could argue rampant media oversensationalism of such violence glorifies it and further incentivizes it to those seeking to commit such a gruesome suicide, but that’s less culture and more partisan wedge-driving and profiteering off ad revenue.

      I’m just criticising how they handle and view guns.

      How do you believe we view firearms? I’m interested in hearing how we can do whatever the heck [we] want.

      Just relax with the guns and emulate their Swiss brethrens who are self-disciplined about handling guns. Rights come with responsibilities.

      It’s fortunate, then, that the vast majority of firearm owners are responsible.

      • @crackajack@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Is it really political partisan though? America is the only developed country with disproportionately high level of mass shootings compared to others. Not to denigrate developing countries, but this high rate of mass shooting in US is comparable to those in developing nations, because these countries have rampant corruption and lack of enforcement of rule of law. And the level of violence is manifestation of that. The US is developed one and is put to much higher standard as a result.

    • @applejacks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      18 months ago

      The Swiss have more guns per capita, they are legally mandated to own guns, but they have practically zero mass shootings unlike the US.

      their country is filled with Swiss people.

      we are a mentally ill melting pot of dozens of different cultures (some that praise violence) that barely tolerate each other.

      • @HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        28 months ago

        No. You can buy it at any gun store quite easily.

        This myth comes from the idea that there is ammunition paid for by the gov’t for the weapon that you used in your term of conscription, that you have to use while you’re at the range. If you want to pay for ammunition yourself at a regular gun store, you are more than welcome to do so.

      • @crackajack@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        08 months ago

        Ammo is regulated. They can only acquire them from regulated spaces like shooting ranges. That’s why the Swiss is one of the top at sports-related shooting.

      • @Kornblumenratte@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Switzerland is ethnically among the most inhomogeneous countries in Europe. The 59.3 % indigenous population is already split among 6 ethnicities – French, Italian, Swiss-German and 3 Romansh. 39.2 % of the population are migrants.

        Get your facts straight.

        source: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/statistiken/bevoelkerung/migration-integration/nach-migrationsstatuts.html

        Edit: the percentage of first-generation migrants seems to be double that of the US, by the way.

        https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/1169711/umfrage/anteil-der-immigranten-in-den-usa/

        • @cricket97@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          18 months ago

          “migrant” doesn’t automatically make them nonwhite. I classify “French, Italian, Swiss-German and 3 Romansh” as white.

          • @Kornblumenratte@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            18 months ago

            Only anemic, Vitamin D-depleted Swiss are white. Some other sick Swiss are red, gray or yellowish. Healthy Swiss come in all colors from rosé to beige to all shades of brown to black, the same is true for immigrants to Switzerland.

            Somehow you lost the term “ethnicity” in your answer and shifted the discussion to skin colour. Assuming this is a reference to the stupid American concept of “race” – please reconnect to reality!

            Skin colour and genetic heritage are completely unrelated to ethnicity.

            There are Bavarians with a skin type of Fitzgerald VI and Afroamericans with a skin type of Fitzgerald II.

            Until the early 20^th century, the American idea of “white” refered to protestant germanic people only – Swiss French, Swiss Italian and Swiss Romansh people might be considered to be “white” by you, but were considered by Angloamericans to be as non-white as Irish or West Africans for the bigger part of Angloamerican history.

    • 😈MedicPig🐷BabySaver😈
      link
      fedilink
      -68 months ago

      We have lots & lots of gun nuts here. I hate them.

      Want a hunting rifle? Fine. Just one.

      Want a hand gun? Must prove a need and can have one 6 shot revolver.

      Weapons fully registered with owner finger printed with renewal every 5 years.

      Ammo? 10 rounds for rifle. 12 for revolver. All brass brought in to buy new ammo. Each purchase requires finger print confirmation.

      Fuck anyone that doesn’t like it.

      • @havokdj@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        48 months ago

        Look, gun politics aside, there is a legitimate reason to have more than one hunting rifle.

        30-06 is great for hunting deer, but would be an extremely poor choice for hunting squirrels and raccoons, considering that there would be very little edible material left.

          • Cosmic Cleric
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            30-06 is great for hunting deer, but would be an extremely poor choice for hunting squirrels and raccoons, considering that there would be very little edible material left.

            Tough shit. Learn to bow hunt.

            You realize that’s like trying to tell someone to pick up their newly purchased big ticket item from the store using a bicycle, right?

            I get you’re trying to limit the use of guns by limiting the availability of guns and their ammo, but where you drew the line is too extrene/limiting.

            At that point you might as well just be honest about it and try to make guns illegal.

            • 😈MedicPig🐷BabySaver😈
              link
              fedilink
              -68 months ago

              Nope. Take it or leave it. I’d even consider allowing multi hunting weapons, eg: shot gun season.

              But, only one long gun in the home at a time. The other must be stored at an official gun locker place, eg: police station, gun club, gun sales store, armory… Finger print ID to swap out which long gun you want.

              • Cosmic Cleric
                link
                fedilink
                English
                38 months ago

                Nope. Take it or leave it.

                Just repeating myself at this point, but …

                At that point you might as well just be honest about it and try to make guns illegal.

                And for the record, I am pro gun control, but what you’re advocating is too extreme to be practical and workable.

      • @HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        38 months ago

        I’m astonished that you’re smart enough to remember to breathe, much less able to read and type.

        How, exactly, do you think that you get good with a firearm, good enough to be safe, good enough to ethically hunt? Do you have this pants-on-head retarded idea that you can shoot ten shots, total, and suddenly know what you’re doing well enough to not gut-shot a deer? Do you think that 12 shots through a revolver is enough to be competent? Do you understand how ejection systems in rifles work, and that you simply don’t recover all of your brass?

        On a short day at the range, I’ll go through about 100 rounds. I’ve been to an IDPA match that had a minimum round count of 120, and a Gun Run match that required a minimum of 50 rifle, and 60 pistol rounds.

        Beyond this - what other civil rights are you willing to accept restrictions on based on need? Do you really need to vote? Do you need to have free speech? Would you be okay limiting all of your online comments to just 12, and having to delete all comments before you could post anything new? Perhaps you should have to demonstrate need in order to not have your house searched by the police, or to plead the 5th?

        Fuck anyone that wants free speech, voting, religion, or the right to not have their teeth shoved in by cops, amiright?

  • @HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    98 months ago

    Well. It’s partly a mental health problem, sure. But it’s not just that.

    We’ve got a number of things going on that a lot of other countries don’t have.

    First, guns are a civil right in the US. Multiple SCOTUS rulings in the last 20 years have affirmed that it’s an individual civil right, and not a collective one. (Which would be weird, since everything else in the Bill of Rights is about people, rather than the gov’t; the power to raise a military was already listed as a power of the gov’t in the constitution, so why would the signatories need to also specify that the gov’t had the right to arm the army that it had raised?)

    Second, the US is one of the few developed countries that has extremely poor social safety networks. We have a low individual and corporate tax rate (again, as far as developed countries go), so we can’t pay for the kind of social services that other countries take for granted. We have comparatively high rates of poverty and a far larger economic inequality gap than most other developed countries.

    Third, we have a declining public education system; we’ve been cutting public education, and putting more money towards selective schools, like charter and magnet schools (and, in some places, public funding for religious schooling), which decreases the quality of education. This shitty education system means that comparatively fewer people–and disproportionately black and Latino people–don’t have access to goo education, which limits their career prospects.

    Fourth, we have a terrible, broken criminal justice system. We focus on punishment rather than rehabilitation, and people that go to prison often find that their opportunities are sharply limited when they get out, likely trapping them in a continued cycle of poverty.

    The latter three things contribute to fairly high rates of violent crimes. The first factor makes crime much more lethal.

    The truth is that the rate violent crime in the US is on par with violent crime in the UK or Australia (violent crime referring to forcible rape, assault/battery, robbery, and murder), with Australia having a quite high reported rate of forcible rape, the UK having a quite high rate of battery, and the US dwarfing their murder rates.

    In regards to spree-killers, there’s not a single profile. The US Secret Service has looked at some thigns that are risk factors, but spree killers are so comparatively rare, and have such widely varied motives, that there’s nothing that they can draw definite conclusions on. When I say that these events are rare, what I mean is that commonly reported figures that claim daily mass shootings aren’t looking at spree killers, but are looking at ordinary crime–robberies, assaults–involving multiple injuries, rather than an active shooter that’s trying to kill as many people as possible. A running gunfight between gang member that sees 2 people killed and ten people shot isn’t what most people think of when they thing “mass shooting”; they’re thinking of something like the Mandelay Bay massacre in 2017, Pulse Nightclub, or Newtown, CT. Some of the people that are spree killers do have a real mental illness; the Aurora, CO murderer is schizophrenic. Many do not.

    There’s not a quick, easy answer, because this wasn’t something that happened overnight. The idea that we’ve never had mass murderers prior to Columbine HS is just factually wrong, and Columbine has been 30 years ago now.