• Saganastic@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Russia is waging war. The US wants to support a free democratic country that borders NATO over a fascist invading country that’s an adversary of NATO.

    • zer0@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why would US also support Turkey, Egypt, Israel or other dictatorship around the world?

          • Saganastic@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Keep the propaganda coming, troll. Your comments are shallow and not representative of reality.

          • revrsevolute@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            cite yah sources and I’ll read into it. I view it as providing aid to a foreign population being invaded by a direct adversary of the people of the United States. The Ukrainian people need saving from Putin’s senseless and ultimately fruitless invasion of their homes. Russians should be embarrassed for how much pain they’ve inflicted, as well as how little they’ve accomplished in this pointless errand to fulfill Putin’s selfish dying wish.

      • Skua@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        “imperialism is when America does things, and the more American it is the more imperialismer it is”

        Other countries can be imperialist too. Like Russia, when it invades its neighbours to annex their territory. Stop defending imperialism. A thing does not automatically become anti-imperialist if the USA doesn’t like it.

        • revrsevolute@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ad hominem fallacy

          I’m not embarrassed I had to look it up, but I’m glad I did!

          Ad hominem (Latin for ‘to the person’), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a term that refers to several types of arguments, most of which are fallacious. Typically this term refers to a rhetorical strategy where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself. This avoids genuine debate by creating a diversion to some irrelevant but often highly charged issue. The most common form of this fallacy is “A makes a claim x, B asserts that A holds a property that is unwelcome, and hence B concludes that argument x is wrong”.