So far my list includes Comcast, EA, and Nestle. Tell me yours, and I’ll help out.

    • pensa@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Why SpaceX? I hate Musk and do not support any of his other… anythings. However, rocket go zoom then land without boom is fun to watch. I am genuinely curious why SpaceX is bad.

      I completely agree about everything else you mentioned.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        However, rocket go zoom then land without boom is fun to watch.

        Yeah, Musk is a true innovater by having them blow up the concrete launchpad on launch instead…

        The government got more money from the patents NASA got then it cost to fund NASA. Privatizing space hurts everyone except the rich asshole who gets the parents.

        • pensa@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          For fucks sake.

          I clearly said I do not like musk. I even went as far as saying I hate him but still that’s the first place you went. What the fuck?

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yeah, but there’s also the cognitive dissonance of you saying SpaceX is fun because they don’t explode…

            But they do explode. Waaaaay more than NASA. Because if a NASA launch goes bad, everyone pays attention. If SpaceX goes bad, people just shrug

            So by your own metrics you just said…

            NASA is better than SpaceX.

            No matter what position I took, it would have disagreed with your comment, because your comment disagrees with itself. Which explains why you think spacex is a positive.

        • toasteecup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          31
          ·
          11 months ago

          A really shitty tech company.

          Oracle hires more lawyers than they do developers then they do things like “oh? You’re using this product in the cloud with the license you purchased? But you didn’t purchase the cloud license”

          They also buy technology and proceed to violate whatever license it has, like ZFS.

        • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Stands for One Rich Asshole Called Larry Ellison, not officially but I like to think it is. It’s a corporation built around a database engine.
          They have a well deserved terrible reputation based on their commercial practices, including but not exhaustive, shipping full fledged software with functionality locked behind paywalls, buying and demolishing established open source companies/projects, suing the shit out of their customers for license violation (see above), price gouging their customers who often have no other choice than to run their products.
          The engine itself is nice and reliable but the business practices of Oracle drives a lot of companies to settle for the competition, at least, those who can afford to leave.

      • Beemo Dinosaurierfuß@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        Why not?

        They own iShares which has some of the biggest ETFs on the market.
        Although I don’t know if their competitors are any better.

        • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I didn’t know they owned an etf. I always say them as more of a hedge fund where they didn’t have a product for the average person to boycott.

    • VieuxQueb@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      11 months ago

      And teflon and other chemicals used in large quantities while delaying the inevitable reports of danger they pose.

  • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Autism Speaks. It has a pro-eugenics mindset, so you’d think everyone would be boycotting it, right? Nope, in fact it’s partnered with the Jim Henson company.

    • Rolivers@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Wish I could. I use linux whenever possible but gaming, hdr and some drm features won’t work on Linux any time soon.

      • Deckweiss@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I’ve been on Linux exclusively for a decade now and I am super excited to get an HDR monitor when it gets implemented (there was some major work being done by redhat and others).

        In the meanwhile, I am still having fun with games, hdr or other fancypants features won’t vhange that.

  • Perfide@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    As far as which companies “deserve” it, it would be quicker to list the ones that don’t.

  • DeadNinja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    11 months ago

    Sorry if this has already been mentioned in the 224 (so far) comments… but another bad guy worth hating is

    Hewlett Packard.

    Their

    “Hey, you need to have our proprietary ink cartrige in your HP inkjet printer plus scanner to print AND to scan as well. The scanner won’t work when you are out of ink”

    Is just plain fuckery.