• ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Didn’t Arabs and Palestinians just flat out refuse to coexist with a Jewish state from the start? The international community proposed a solution and they refused to accept it.

    Certainly if they chose to fight, and lost, then they have to face the consequences which might include losing their land.

    That’s hardy unprecedented, the very city I live in was largely founded by seizing lands from the British during the American war of independence, because they lost…

    I would say while yes it’s “wrong” to kick someone off their land, both parties have to at least be reasonable and willing to compromise when you have a complex ethnic and religious issue. Otherwise conflict is inevitable.

    None of which is to excuse any war crimes committed by either side. I just think it’s more nuanced than “israel bad apartheid state”.

    • Cyclohexane@lemmy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Didn’t Arabs and Palestinians just flat out refuse to coexist with a Jewish state from the start?

      “coexist with a Jewish state” is a bit of a contradictory statement. Arabs coexisted with Jews fine prior to the Zionist project. A Jewish state is by definition a state exclusive to Jews. That’s the opposite of coexistnece by definition, and yes that is exactly why Arabs (Muslims and Christians alike) refused it.

      Certainly if they chose to fight,

      Resist*. they chose to resist occupation, expulsion from their homes, massacre and genocide.

      fight, and lost, then they have to face the consequences which might include losing their land.

      Ahh, so if someone fights you for your land, destroys your home and genocides your people, then they’ve earned it?? Well I should not be surprised that someone who lives in a nation founded on genocide thinks this is okay.

      yes it’s “wrong” to kick someone off their land, both parties have to at least be reasonable and willing to compromise

      “hey man, I know I just took over your home and burned your family alive in front of your eyes. But you gotta be reasonable here and be willing to compromise!”

      What more of a compromise do you need beyond coexistence? That’s all Palestinians have asked for, and Israel continues to deny them basic rights, no matter how peaceful they are.

      And I end with: Israel bad apartheid state. It is truly that simple.

      • ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Ahh, so if someone fights you for your land, destroys your home and genocides your people, then they’ve earned it?? Well I should not be surprised that someone who lives in a nation founded on genocide thinks this is okay.

        Nice try putting words in my mouth, but I never said any of this was “OK”. It doesn’t have my “blessing”, I merely gave my observation grounded in reality, of how the world works. Hell no, if it was up to me, everything everywhere would be resolved peacefully, fairly and with diplomacy, not violence.

        Honestly given your tone and snide remarks, I suspect you are too emotionally invested on this topic, for whatever reason, to have a rational discussion.

        But either way, the ability to occupy and defend land will remain the determining factor in maintaining sovereignty, now and in the future. You can’t count on the international community, and you can’t count on what’s right or just. ( call me a pessimist, I’ll agree :)

      • Basuliic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        But there are Arabs even in military right now so you are wrong, learn first then judge.

          • Basuliic@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Jewish state is by definition a state exclusive to Jews. That’s the opposite of coexistnece by definition, and yes that is exactly why Arabs (Muslims and Christians alike) refused it.

            • Cyclohexane@lemmy.mlM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              How does the presence of Arabs in Israel’s war machine disprove that? You didn’t answer this question.

              There were Jews who fought in the Nazis ranks. Based on your ridiculous logic, the Nazis are inclusive of the Jews (obviously incorrect because your logic is flawed).

              There were black people fighting in the US armies as well, even during Jim Crow era.

                • Cyclohexane@lemmy.mlM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Palestinians who genocided jews for centuries

                  Source? Highly doubt

                  Even now normal Muslims live in Israel

                  Treated as second class citizens, stripped of their rights, and brutalized daily

                  but those monkeys [Muslims who live in Israel] don’t want to coexist and only want to kill

                  Source? Highly doubt

                  Also, calling Muslims or another group “Monkeys” is not allowed in this community. I am warning you. Next time will be a ban.

                  Look at last statements from their leaders

                  I have. Nothing strikes me as a fraction of the concern that Israeli statements are.

                  look at state of people in Gaza

                  After Israel has been bombarding them, burning them alive, and cutting off essential resources for decades? Man, I wonder why they’re suffering.