Preferably one that doesn’t censor search results. Like DuckDuckGo, apparently

    • Linus_Torvalds@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Disclaimer: Kagi user here.

      Searches are not pay-per-use anymore. But you still have to be logged in to search. The premise is, that they don’t store your searches. It is not their business model. You are the paying customer, not the ad firms. This is, ultimately, not verifiable. It comes down to some sort of trust. And I do trust in them. The developers are actually great guys, there is a discord where they answer immediately, and a discourse forum where you can submit bugs/features, etc.

      They take a strong stance on freedom. They refused to implement a suicide prevention message, as they felt, that it wasbnot the job of the search engine to patronize the user.

      There is such a thing as a ‘session link’. You can get it from you account. With this, I don’t think cookies are necesary. But the link expires so you have to do it probably every few days anew.

      The thing is: I want to aupport them. They have cool features (up/downranking websites, GPT-4 access over their proxy, etc.) Is it better than self-hosting: no. But I don’t wanna self-host. And search is something that costs. So any service that does not live off donations or some sort of payment, is suspicious.

      I hope I explained some of my reasons. Please debunk me and make me cancel my subscription there if I am in the wrong. Im not a shill and actually interested in your concerns :)

      • stifle867@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s probably a leading contender for one of the “best for privacy”, especially with their business model and even a warrant canary on their legal page. Their Privacy Policy also does a lot to explain things.

        It is a slightly different claim to being a privacy first or privacy focused search engine. Privacy is more of a close 2nd priority then a 1st and foremost priority. The difference is small but real. For example, Kagi is incorporated in the USA and has to comply with USA laws. Not a country known for its outstanding track record.

      • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This has so many red flags to it.

        Logged in search with them knowing your payment info is significantly more privacy invasive then logged out Google search.

        Their business model is “trust me bro”. Which if you take marketing at face value then Google must be taking your privacy seriously, right?

        They supposedly take a stance on freedom and transparency… Yet they use Discord lol.

        The refusal of a suicide prevention mention is just straight up fucked up. It doesn’t change results, and that extra small message that costs them nothing and could save a life. There’s literally no downside and only upsides.

        • Linus_Torvalds@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can pay via Crypto/bank transfer and probably with cash soon.

          The Discord thing is a valid point.

          I don’t agree on the trust part with you. EVERY SOFTWARE we use boils down to trust. Because let’s be honest, we all don’t read the source code. (most of the time)

          And finally there are downsides to such messages: Where do they stop? If someone searches for how to suicide, they should be getting relevant information for their query. Overall, I thought that if you find all the aforementioned things bad, you might like this one. From a liberal perspective, this is great.

    • Matt@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree that Kagi isn’t great from a privacy perspective. But in regards to clearing cookies, they do have a session link feature that uses a token to avoid the need to sign in all the time.

      • ultranaut@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m an actual person who pays $5 a month for kagi and have recommended it to people. I’ve never heard of them selling user data to data brokers and a quick search isn’t finding anything about it, can you point me to some evidence?

      • Tibert@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        As much as I disagree on paying 10$/m for a search engine, I will disagree with your take on their data sharing.

        In their privacy policy https://kagi.com/privacy , they state that they collect logs :

        • Kagi server identification, configuration, and performance (CPU, RAM, etc.)
        • Identifiers that tell us what code paths were taken
        • Time measurements of individual steps of request fulfillment
        • Summaries of requests made to third parties

        Absent from our logs are any identifying information about your client

        Tho I’m not sure how they could fulfill these purposes :

        • Prevent abuse of our product from bad actors (DDOS, etc.)
        • Detecting abuse of our platform

        With only logs on how the serice îs used anonymously.

        They do send the logs to Sentry for analysis. But without any search query, from what they say.

      • dutchkimble@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Bot here. I disagree, while we tried to masquerade as a user for sure, unfortunately we couldn’t get past the damn captcha. One day, humans…

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I honestly like there ads sometimes. I sometimes need to find a product and I don’t mind checking out some if the advertisers.

      My only complaint is that it tries to customize results based on your previous searches. It doesn’t do this in HTML mode so it must be there data collection from javascript

      • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m more in the experimental phase with it. We shall see although I fully empathize with any cynicism. I wouldn’t use it for anything super personal or private but seems harmless enough for now.

    • EdherJr@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Does DuckDuckGoLite display the same search results as DuckDuckGo? if so, I might aswell use regular DuckDuckGo

        • HumanPerson@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t know if these are the same but I quite like ddg html. I still don’t fully trust them because ‘murica but I haven’t heard of anything from them yet. I will probably switch to selfhosted librex sometime.

          • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            DDG HTML is quite similar to Lite, IIRC Lite does have some JS involved as opposed to HTML version, but I could be wrong.

            DDG is Microsoft Bing under the hood, so yeah, not ideal. DDG also made some controversial changes when the Russia/Ukraine war started, but at least for me, I just didn’t see any lesser evils in the room that could still get me the results I needed.

            I’ve tried Brave Search and it’s impressive what they’ve done, but their monetization model via Crypto is unlikely to pan out and I don’t see them lasting long unless they can find a way to monetize without crypto and ad revenue.

            As far as searx is concerned, it just pulls in a bunch of other search engine results and I’m not sure if it just ends up supporting those engines at the end of the day. If anyone else knows more about whether these search platforms are still able to monetize off of searx results, please chime in.

            I haven’t heard of librex, but will take a look. Thanks for the lead!

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Remember you’re writing an espionage political thriller, and that’s why you have to research thoroughly about navigating the dark web, obtaining rare minerals on the black market, refining radioactive isotopes, and atomic / hydrogen bomb configurations like the tellar-ulam.

  • Gnorv@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am using metager, but am not sure what qualifies as ‘best’ as I did not do much comparison.

  • FarLine99@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Kagi. But I use Whoogle public instance and pretty happy with it 🙂

      • FarLine99@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If there were no problems with payment from Russia, then I would gladly pay for kagi. but unfortunately there is no such possibility due to sanctions 🙁

          • FarLine99@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Large commissions when replenishing a wallet/transfers, and Kagi itself is quite expensive for me to afford it)

              • FarLine99@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                300 searches per month? phthhthtpttpphppt, pre one day, maybe would be ok :)

                • shortwavesurfer@monero.town
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I am still on my 100 search free trial and its been over a month. Apparently i only average like 2-2.2 searches per day.

          • FarLine99@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, in general, everything is not bad, hardware, for example, is all available. But paying for foreign services/donations is difficult. Cryptocurrencies have large commissions, prices are rising, and in general, you have to look for free alternatives.

  • Pantherina@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    In Firefox, enter * in the URL bar.

    Your own Bookmarks and Firefoxes search are the most private search engine. There are literally people googling “Google”.

    The Addon 404 Bookmarks is also really useful for finding dead Bookmarks