• Annoyed_🦀 @lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Good movie: the one you enjoy

    Bad movie: the one you don’t

    Simple as that, my metric of scoring isn’t good or bad, it’s whether i enjoy it or whether it annoy me. I pick what i watch and will go through review and score so most of the time i know i gonna enjoy it, but sometime an outlier will pops up. I’m still not over how annoyed i am for 28 Weeks Later.

    • Senal@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      23 hours ago

      That assumes that enjoyment is the only metric, which is common, but not universal.

      Some people can think the movie is of high quality, but the subject matter isn’t for them, as an example.

      Think of it like food:

      Good food: the food you enjoy

      Bad food: the food you don’t

      Unless you’re basing good and bad on how “healthy” the food is (for whatever given metric of health you want to use)

      • fodor@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        16 hours ago

        What you’re saying makes sense except that’s not what OOP was talking about. They weren’t asking what definition of “quality” to use.

        • Senal@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Indeed, but my comment was a reply to another poster who was implying a specific metric.

          I was just trying to point out that metric isn’t the same for everyone, even a composite metric will differ person to person

      • Annoyed_🦀 @lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        21 hours ago

        And that assuming “enjoyment” is a single metric, because in the matter of fact, it’s an overall score with the combination of everything the critics use. If i like it i like it, figuring it out why and justify it is part of the critics job.

        If you wanna translate that into food, then the good food will taste good and bad food will taste horrible.

        • skisnow@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Yeah. Nobody enjoys watching Requiem for a Dream or Schindler’s List, they’re still top films.

          • Senal@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            And somebody who includes health in their metric of enjoyment will have a different threshold

          • Honytawk@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Those aren’t “enjoyable”, but they are entertaining.

            And imagine that, judging entertainment on how much they entertained you.