• Joeffect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    If they are all about swappable parts, and being able to upgrade your phone how you want … Shouldn’t this just be a module upgrade… Of the main part? Maybe I don’t understand it … At the very least the old parts should work with the new system right? Unless something major has changed.

    • ayane_m@lemmy.vg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Exactly. Framework does it correctly; fairphone does not.

        • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Might be more challenging.

          Laptop, its simple, if wifi and bluetooth works, its gonna work around the entire world (it’s all standardized).

          Phones? I mean the main functions of a phone is phone calls and data use. Every country has different bands, and some carriers/countries have IMEI whitelisting.

          • Liz@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Yeah but the entire philosophy of Framework would be one phone construction standard and then you swap out the radio chip. Granted, there’s never been a hard phone standard, and the parts have never been designed for swapping. They would be the ones designing and commissioning these standards. Anyway, so I’m gonna be waiting very patiently.

      • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Not putting in a 3.5mm jack says enough. They sell Bluetooth earbuds I wouldn’t call that “fair”. It leads to more landfill. Phones with 3.5mm jacks also have BT, and don’t start about USBC singles, that’s more to buy and more landfill when they inevitable break.

        • ayane_m@lemmy.vg
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          22 hours ago

          I hear you! Though I don’t mind the lack of a 3.5 mm jack¹, it is still an anti-feature, and I fully agree that the TWS style of in-ears are antithetical to the repairability ethos. It’s especially bad when they sell one themselves.

          Until Linux phones reliably support 5G communications with major carriers (this is a kernel driver issue for modems), I’m going to run with my current phone until it crumbles… Or at least until someone comes out with an actual modular phone where the mainboard can just be swapped as with desktops and Framework laptops.

          ¹I use a very high quality “dongle” DAC (Moonriver 2) and it gives me a cleaner, lower impedance, higher power output than any phone’s on-board audio can. If I’m going to be using wired headphones, might as well go all the way.

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        So with framework you can keep the cpu and camera and swap out the Mobo for a better one?