Researchers say contamination found at Montebello Islands is part of fallout from 1950s British tests and will persist for thousands of years
Researchers say contamination found at Montebello Islands is part of fallout from 1950s British tests and will persist for thousands of years
I didn’t realize the paper was linked! It specifically mentions:
This is a unit of radiation / mass. Going by a WolframAlpha example, one cubic meter of “typical” emits soil about 10,000 Bq. 1 cubic meter of the tested soil emits about > 900,000 Bq, though the high end is an outlier:
So 90x above ambient soil radiation, it seems.
…This is not a lot! Dirt is not very radioactive, we are talking microscopic amounts compared to radiation sources like X-rat machines. You wouldn’t want to inhale a ton of the soil, but still.
@brucethemoose
Yeah, cool!
I know nothing about radioactive contamination in the environment.
I was merely commenting on the ‘fearmongering’ aspect.
It should (hopefully) be uncommon to see ‘fearmongering’ or ‘click bait’ from The Guardian, but everyone should be alert to ‘alarmist’ language.
The Guardian was perhaps unclear that:
Some sites have 4x the ‘nominal background radiation’, and
Some sites have up to 4500x the ‘nominal background radiation’.
But, I don’t think The Guardian was ‘fearmongering’…
😁
I’m going to continue to stay away from all radioactive sources while preparing my banana smoothies on a granite bench top, and smoking the odd cigarette!
I couldn’t possibly be exposed to any form of radiation from those activities!
☢️
Yeah it wasn’t that bad on the guardian’s part, papers have always written headlines that sell. And you absolutely 100% don’t want to inhale plutonium dust. It alpha decays with a lot of energy, which even in small amounts is a recipe for lung cancer. IDK specifics for how much it would take to get kicked up and be deadly.