• squaresinger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Wasn’t the word motonormativity from you? I had to re-read that word a few times to get what you were saying with it and it’s good.

    sunzu2 called it a slur, and a good one at that.

    • lgsp@feddit.it@feddit.itOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I wish I was that clever, but no. It’s from a researcher named Ian Walker, coined in a very interesting article. It has its own Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motonormativity

      Also mainstream articles: https://www.theverge.com/2023/1/31/23579510/car-brain-motornormativity-study-ian-walker

      And a video by GCN! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_4GZnGl55c

      I’m surprised that by being in the fuck cars community you never heard the term!

    • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      To explain it quickly: You know Heteronormativity, the fact that many people are hetero and assume others are too. This is a similar normativity. Many people (depends on where you live yadda yadda) always drive everywhere and never consider a world where cars are not their only/primary way to get around. They will fail to imagine cities where cars are not as important or common, because they associate transport=car. This is harmful, because cars are in fact very inefficient for most tasks and have pretty bad side effects such as taking tons of valuable space in a city or noise or pollution.

      • squaresinger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        No need to explain. I just had to read the word a few times to separate the partial words and understand what was written.