• Cypher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    22 hours ago

    The South China Sea is shallow, a poor operating environment for nuclear subs.

    Containment of China to the South China Sea is a US strategy and one which Australia is subsiding, while materially hurting its ability to defend Australia’s coastline.

    • skribe@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      A nuke sub operating there for a couple of months is still better than a DE that leaves after a week (presuming it can reach that far at all).

      • Tenderizer@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        If we’re so concerned about the South China Sea, we can give Taiwan or Japan diesel subs. It’s not like the nuclear subs would be of much use to us anyway if they’re on the other side of Indonesia.

        Although I can’t imagine an Internal Combusion Engine sub being at all stealthy, so I’d hope there’s some kind of third option.

        • tau@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          Although I can’t imagine an Internal Combusion Engine sub being at all stealthy

          Diesel electrics can be very stealthy, with the potential to be even more so than nuclear subs when trying to hide (given equivalent level of technology elsewhere in the design). What they can’t do is continue being stealthy for anywhere near the time a nuclear sub can as eventually you need to come near the surface and run the diesel to recharge the batteries. Diesel electrics are also comparatively range limited - while they can travel a considerable distance nuclear subs are effectively only limited by their ability to supply the crew.