• Bloomcole@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Not ‘every’ land but I get the point.
    Still it doesn’t compare and there’s no excuse.
    In this case the colonising is still going on, hence the genocide.
    They are not ‘citizens’ but colonisers.
    They deserve all they get, what they don’t deserve is sympathy.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I would disagree. If you go back far enough, every land has been stolen. There is probably no piece of land that hasn’t been held by multiple different groups over time.

      I’d also argue a government existing at all is stolen land. What gives them the right to the land, instead of the people using it as they want? At some point someone decided the land was theirs, and not someone else’s, and decided they could sell, lend, or use the land as they want, even if someone else also wanted to use it.

      • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Someone made the same point so answered this already to show it is an invalid argument in the case of Palestine.

          • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            In this case the colonising is still going on, hence the genocide. They are not ‘citizens’ but colonisers.
            It’s not an unfortunate fait accompli like the US that eradicated the original inhabitants for instance.