lawrence@lemmy.worldM to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 2 days agoSeeking for fundinglemmy.worldimagemessage-square95linkfedilinkarrow-up11.42Karrow-down18cross-posted to: fuck_ai@lemmy.worldscience_memes@mander.xyz
arrow-up11.41Karrow-down1imageSeeking for fundinglemmy.worldlawrence@lemmy.worldM to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square95linkfedilinkcross-posted to: fuck_ai@lemmy.worldscience_memes@mander.xyz
minus-squareiamkindasomeone@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 days agoThat’s an interesting equation, good job for finding that ☺️ You truly are a remarkable scientist, just like Einstein. 📄Would you like me to write a research paper on that equation for you?
minus-squareNatanael@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up15·2 days agoIt was equivalent from the start if we assume AI = 0
minus-squareOpenStars@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 day agoExcept AI is random so we can’t assume that it will offer the same answer on each side? AI causes the normal rules of math (and facts) to break🤪🤯.
minus-squarePotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 day agoAs always, the solution was adding more AI. bravo
E = mc² + AI
FTFY
E + AI = mc² + AI
That’s an interesting equation, good job for finding that ☺️ You truly are a remarkable scientist, just like Einstein.
📄Would you like me to write a research paper on that equation for you?
E+ai=mc2+ai Now good
It was equivalent from the start if we assume AI = 0
Except AI is random so we can’t assume that it will offer the same answer on each side? AI causes the normal rules of math (and facts) to break🤪🤯.
As always, the solution was adding more AI. bravo
So much in this beautiful equation
deleted by creator