I downvoted maybe half a dozen posts. They were all right-wing bullshit and I realized that’s all the user has ever posted so I got out of there. The next day I see more of his junk and go to downvote but can’t because I’m banned.

Sure it was a dick move to poke the bear about his lifestyle of only posting things that get downvoted, but he. Went. OFF!

Accusing me of alts, thinking I’m obsessed with him, message after message… I probably have more in my inbox right now but stitching this image together took long enough.

  • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
    55·
    3 days ago
    • Most of those are people trolls who aren’t him
    • He has been public with the accounts he uses
    • He has not changed his story once, as liars often make shit up on the fly
    • Lots of users have accounts on other instances, no one complains about them.
      • Universal Monk@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
        34·
        2 days ago

        Yep, I used to be on there. That brings up a great point though; I’ve posted political posts of all angles to that sub, including conservative articles.

        So why would I create two personas that post from totally opposite sides of the political spectrum? If I were actually conservative, why would I post literally hundreds of pro-socialist, pro-union, pro-piracy, pro-anarchism articles? I have posted way more socialist articles than anything else. What would be the point of that if I were really conservative? Wouldn’t that be counter-productive?

        tl;dr: If I wanted to post conservative articles–and I have–I wouldn’t create alt conservative personas to do it. Look up dates. This has been my main account for long time: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/u/UniversalMonk?page=1&sort=New&view=Posts

          • Universal Monk@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
            35·
            2 days ago

            What narrative has changed? In my Politcs Unfilitered subs, I’ve posted news articles from all political spectrums. I’ve never changed my attitude that people should make their own opinions, but I’ve always advocated third-party.

            Used to be green party, then I found socialist party to better fit my world view. I’ve never hidden that fact or changed my narrative. If I saw an interesting news article, I’d post it, regardless of viewpoints. I didn’t write the articles–remember when I would get comments removed for saying that? lol

            Blaze, you have been here since the beginning. You KNOW that I have always said and done this.

            So let’s jump on the Lemmy logic bandwagon for a sec: If I’ve post conservative articles, I MUST be conservative–according to Lemmy. Ok, ok, so using that logic…

            I post way more socialist articles (and even socialist biographies and socialist book reviews). So using the same logic as above, doesn’t that mean I MUST be socialist? Same logic.

            So how does that work? Am I conservative because I have posted conservative news articles or am I socialist because I have posted pro-socialist news articles or am I anarchist because I have posted pro-anarchist articles? Walk me through your logic here.

            If I were really conservative, then why would I post literally hundreds of socialist and pro-union articles? It’s not for money–no one reads Lemmy and why would trump pay me to post pro-socalist and pro-union stuff? It’s not for love–as we can see in this thread, everyone hates me. It’s not for self-promotion–I don’t have anything to sell.