I downvoted maybe half a dozen posts. They were all right-wing bullshit and I realized that’s all the user has ever posted so I got out of there. The next day I see more of his junk and go to downvote but can’t because I’m banned.

Sure it was a dick move to poke the bear about his lifestyle of only posting things that get downvoted, but he. Went. OFF!

Accusing me of alts, thinking I’m obsessed with him, message after message… I probably have more in my inbox right now but stitching this image together took long enough.

  • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    3 days ago

    That’s not how the disengage rule works. It’s not a trump card to have the last word in.

    • Universal Monk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Fair point. I was trying to keep from a slapfighting removal. It’s a fine line between defending myself, and having the arguments just keep going on. So maybe saying “Let’s move on” would have been more appropriate, I’ve edited comment. I’m not the subject of OP’s post so I wasn’t sure how to defend myself when people say it’s me, but I don’t wanna be accused of a slapfight.

      • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 days ago

        I think defending yourself against libel is OK, but you can just write in the end that you’re not interested in arguing about this further. If they then try to argue with you, just reply with ‘disengage’