stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 day agobuild walkable communitiesslrpnk.netimagemessage-square106linkfedilinkarrow-up1655arrow-down119file-text
arrow-up1636arrow-down1imagebuild walkable communitiesslrpnk.netstabby_cicada@slrpnk.net to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 day agomessage-square106linkfedilinkfile-text
Edit: of course this is satire. The power of the reading comprehension devil grows stronger every day 😢
minus-squareTaleya@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down2·edit-21 day ago… Did i really need to add an /s? I thought the quotation marks were a clear enough indicator. People want older suburbs because they’re planned to be walkable
minus-squarePresidentCamacho@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down7·1 day agoAsking a very regular question, getting an answer, and then being sassy and saying “that was sarcasm” Lol, your head just disappeared up your own ass.
minus-squareTaleya@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down6·1 day agoYou know you can just say “i misread that comment”. You’re allowed to do that. You don’t have to abuse people. That’s a choice you made
minus-squareEndlessNightmare@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 day agoYeah, their response was unnecessarily caustic. Your reply was reasonable and I understood the intention of the original comment from the quotation marks.
minus-squarehowrar@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 day agoI see no indication that they missed the sarcasm. I also think it’s lame The “also” meaning that they believe you also think it’s lame. Edit: Oh, I just realized the post-war suburbs are the walkable ones. That makes more sense.
…
Did i really need to add an /s? I thought the quotation marks were a clear enough indicator.
People want older suburbs because they’re planned to be walkable
Asking a very regular question, getting an answer, and then being sassy and saying “that was sarcasm”
Lol, your head just disappeared up your own ass.
You know you can just say “i misread that comment”. You’re allowed to do that.
You don’t have to abuse people. That’s a choice you made
Yeah, their response was unnecessarily caustic. Your reply was reasonable and I understood the intention of the original comment from the quotation marks.
I see no indication that they missed the sarcasm.
The “also” meaning that they believe you also think it’s lame.
Edit: Oh, I just realized the post-war suburbs are the walkable ones. That makes more sense.