• GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    I would love to understand why saying “Don’t support cunts” is such a non-controversial statement.

    Until it comes to Harry Potter.

    Especially considering how simple it is to do.

    • dandelion (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      it is interesting how JK Rowling hasn’t had the same boycott pressure than Elon Musk and Tesla, I think trans rights are just not as motivating to most people, unfortunately

    • Anomalocaris@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      because it’s Don’t support assholes,

      but what if it affects me personally?

      • Vinstaal0@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        There is a huge difference between a company being very protective about their intellectual property and somebody actively working on destroying lives on humans.

      • Actionschnils@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Nintendo just has a weird concept of protecting their property. Rowling instead is an arsehole