AbuTahir@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 day agoApple just proved AI "reasoning" models like Claude, DeepSeek-R1, and o3-mini don't actually reason at all. They just memorize patterns really well.archive.isexternal-linkmessage-square336linkfedilinkarrow-up1857arrow-down141file-textcross-posted to: apple_enthusiast@lemmy.world
arrow-up1816arrow-down1external-linkApple just proved AI "reasoning" models like Claude, DeepSeek-R1, and o3-mini don't actually reason at all. They just memorize patterns really well.archive.isAbuTahir@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 day agomessage-square336linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: apple_enthusiast@lemmy.world
minus-squarekadup@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·1 day ago By that metric, you can argue Kasparov isn’t thinking during chess Kasparov’s thinking fits pretty much all biological definitions of thinking. Which is the entire point.
Kasparov’s thinking fits pretty much all biological definitions of thinking. Which is the entire point.
Is thinking necessarily biologic?