• Pete Hahnloser@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The Internal Revenue Service. It’s the U.S. tax collection agency, created a bit over a century ago under, shall we say, questionable circumstances.

          • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            17 minutes ago

            There is no historical agreement that the earth is round, but guess what?

            When the second argument that is listed in Wikipedia is that Ohio doesn’t count when it had been a state for over a century before the amendment was proposed, I start to think these arguments are specious at best. It seems every judge the case had gone before agreed with that stance, which also sounds like historical agreement to me. Given the amendment was proposed due to the Supreme Court overturning income tax as unconstitutional, it also appears the courts were more than willing to rule against income tax prior to this supposedly dubious amendment.

            Do you have any evidence that is stronger than the Obama birther conspiracies?

      • megopie@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I suspect that they’ve been pressured to keep it out of public by turbo tax lobbyists, but with the straight on attempt to kill it lately, they decided just to ignore that pressure and push it out to spite those lobbyists.

      • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Cooperating with the law is often percieved as an act of defiance with this administration, though.