literature.cafe
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Flying Squid@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years ago

Microsoft Needs So Much Power to Train AI That It's Considering Small Nuclear Reactors

futurism.com

external-link
message-square
388
link
fedilink
1.12K
external-link

Microsoft Needs So Much Power to Train AI That It's Considering Small Nuclear Reactors

futurism.com

Flying Squid@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years ago
message-square
388
link
fedilink
Microsoft is betting on small modular nuclear reactors to grow its energy infrastructure for training AI, a highly ambitious plan.
  • EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    2 years ago

    Nuclear power is actually way cheaper.

    You just need to find a geologically safe place to put it and you need to make sure everyone involved follows safety protocols to the letter. And you can’t have anyone cutting corners to save money. You need to spare no expense when it comes to safety.

    The only issue is that people don’t stay strict with keeping everything safe sometimes. People are terrified of it because when something goes wrong, everyone can see the very gruesome results very quickly

    But I don’t think microsoft or any company should be making an AI at the rate they are if it’s going to take as much resources as it seems.

    • Nobsi@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost_of_electricity_by_source#Capital_costs

      No, it isnt.
      Safety isnt what makes nuclear expensive. You actually got rawdogged by Nuclear fanatics.

      • Chris@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Damn. Sucks to still see Natural Gas as the cheapest.

        I think that modern nuclear designs have a place in decarbonization but I don’t think it is cheaper and we have a lot of hurdles still.

        • Natanael@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          Wind power at shores is generally cheapest

      • Natanael@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Capital costs is incomplete, you need to look at lifetime costs versus lifetime production to get a more useful average - Levelized cost of energy (LCOE)

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levelized_cost_of_electricity

        https://www.lazard.com/research-insights/2023-levelized-cost-of-energyplus/

        https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/levelized-cost-of-energy

        https://www.iea.org/reports/projected-costs-of-generating-electricity-2020

        • EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Wikipedia is owned by someone who’s married to an intelligence agency member.

          • Natanael@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            I see absolutely no relevance here

            • EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              Mmkay

      • EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Wikipedia is owned by someone who’s married to an intelligence agency member.

        • Nobsi@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          Lemmy is owned by genocide deniers. Whats your point?

    • UFO@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yea this entire clickbait can be summarized as “company looks to spend less on high capacity power”

    • not_gsa@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      Rare lemming reasonable take

    • monobot@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      And you just need to find good non science fiction way to deal with nuclear waste.

      And some ethical ways of aquiring uranium.

      With all that calculated in, I am certain how much cheaper it is.

Technology@lemmy.world

technology@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@lemmy.world

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


  • @L4s@lemmy.world
  • @autotldr@lemmings.world
  • @PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks
  • @wikibot@lemmy.world
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 3.77K users / day
  • 9.62K users / week
  • 17.8K users / month
  • 36.9K users / 6 months
  • 33 local subscribers
  • 69.8K subscribers
  • 14.3K Posts
  • 576K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • L3s@lemmy.world
  • enu@lemmy.world
  • Technopagan@lemmy.world
  • L4sBot@lemmy.world
  • L3s@hackingne.ws
  • L4s@hackingne.ws
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org