Flying Squid@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoMicrosoft Needs So Much Power to Train AI That It's Considering Small Nuclear Reactorsfuturism.comexternal-linkmessage-square388fedilinkarrow-up11.15Karrow-down129
arrow-up11.12Karrow-down1external-linkMicrosoft Needs So Much Power to Train AI That It's Considering Small Nuclear Reactorsfuturism.comFlying Squid@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square388fedilink
minus-squaresixCats@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up50arrow-down5·1 year agoThis seems kind of ideal though, computers provide a near constant load (relatively speaking) that combines very well with nuclear energy. Perhaps we should be asking why we haven’t already been doing this for the past decade?
minus-squareActers@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down6·edit-21 year agoBecause it costs less money to push the cost to for taxpayers to subsidize it than owning it Correction
minus-squareDoomBot5@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·1 year agoThose data centers are paying for their electrical usage. Economies of scale just make it more favorable for them over building their own power generation (solar/wind excluded).
minus-squareguacupado@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·1 year agoTell me you know nothing about data centers without telling me.
This seems kind of ideal though, computers provide a near constant load (relatively speaking) that combines very well with nuclear energy.
Perhaps we should be asking why we haven’t already been doing this for the past decade?
Because it costs less money
to push the cost tofor taxpayers to subsidize it than owning itCorrection
Those data centers are paying for their electrical usage. Economies of scale just make it more favorable for them over building their own power generation (solar/wind excluded).
deleted by creator
Tell me you know nothing about data centers without telling me.