The roughly two-hectare facility, still under construction, is hosting what could be called a carbon removal Olympics. It will pilot eight different versions of a similar technology using various machines that will suck in air, remove the carbon dioxide and send it to a central plant where it will be compressed and liquified for storage deep underground.

The winner of this initiative wouldn’t get a medal on a podium. Instead, Deep Sky, the Montreal-based project developer behind it, plans to take the best versions of the direct air capture technology that prove most effective in Canada’s climate and deploy them on a commercial scale all over the country.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yeah, planting trees (in a place where forest fires aren’t going to be a problem) is probably cheaper and less energy intensive.

      • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        It took thousands of years for plants to capture the carbon we burn every year. We are so far past ‘the trees will help us’.

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          That doesn’t mean that planting more trees can’t be a part of the solution.

          No, not the entire solution. But a cheap, quick and easy part of it.