• Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s astounding how stupid that decision was. Fakespot, quite literally a device to help deter people from buying products, was gobbled up by way too much money by Mozilla - who - apparently wanted it to make profit? How?! Why?! Why did they even buy it?

    I think it was just executive idiocy. They searched for extensions with the term privacy in them, bought it, and thought it would make their product worth more. I’m getting really tired of companies just sunsetting products the instant they don’t make money.

    We really need an open version of fakespot.

    • LWD@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Teixeira v Mozilla (2024):

      Apart from Firefox, none of Mozilla’s other product offerings were profitable, with the Pocket product notably being allowed to operate in a state of negative profitability for over 5 years before Mr. Teixeira joined Mozilla.