weird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 1 day agoThe duality of mansub.wetshaving.socialimagemessage-square31linkfedilinkarrow-up1582arrow-down111
arrow-up1571arrow-down1imageThe duality of mansub.wetshaving.socialweird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square31linkfedilink
minus-squareZwiebel@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 day agoNo that is ambigous, it could also mean the opposite of asexual (aka allosexual)
minus-squareSeptimaeus@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up1·14 hours agoAnd the ambiguity fits bisexuality better anyway. It’s useful too. You can use it to cut the knot on the bi-vs-pan debate, for example, or avoid silly arguments about gender distribution of partners, or say “nunya,” etc.
No that is ambigous, it could also mean the opposite of asexual (aka allosexual)
And the ambiguity fits bisexuality better anyway. It’s useful too. You can use it to cut the knot on the bi-vs-pan debate, for example, or avoid silly arguments about gender distribution of partners, or say “nunya,” etc.