Charles Darwin applied for an interview, you said? Yeah I’ve heard of him. Tell him to contact us when he’s able to solve some differential equations. Literally unhireable fuck, who does he think he is.
Is is possible to be genuinely very good at designing all kinds of experiments and executing them wothout having any interest/significant capabilities in solving the statistical work involved. I think you see this a lot in medical science. Luckily science is almost always performed in teams where everyone has their own bot of expertise.
Also, there are the more qualitative (instead of quantitative) sciences like anthropology where you simply don’t need the strong math.
If you’re good at science but not good at math, you still can’t do it for a living.
Charles Darwin applied for an interview, you said? Yeah I’ve heard of him. Tell him to contact us when he’s able to solve some differential equations. Literally unhireable fuck, who does he think he is.
There’s a modern times Charles Darwin?
How can you be good at science if you’re not good at math. Seriously asking a question here.
Is is possible to be genuinely very good at designing all kinds of experiments and executing them wothout having any interest/significant capabilities in solving the statistical work involved. I think you see this a lot in medical science. Luckily science is almost always performed in teams where everyone has their own bot of expertise.
Also, there are the more qualitative (instead of quantitative) sciences like anthropology where you simply don’t need the strong math.