Gollum@feddit.org to Today I Learned@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoTIL there’s a historical list of sexually active popes, including notes on whether they had childrenen.wikipedia.orgexternal-linkmessage-square15linkfedilinkarrow-up1154arrow-down11 cross-posted to: wikipedia@lemmy.world
arrow-up1153arrow-down1external-linkTIL there’s a historical list of sexually active popes, including notes on whether they had childrenen.wikipedia.orgGollum@feddit.org to Today I Learned@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square15linkfedilink cross-posted to: wikipedia@lemmy.world
minus-squarePunkRockSportsFan@fanaticus.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up33arrow-down9·1 month agoI’m pretty sure most of the popes were sexually active. They “had” children. Sexually. Because all religion is a scam used to control fools and children. And Catholic priests swear they will never ever have sex with women and surround themselves with boys in dresses. And they raped millions of kids. Doubtless many of them were raped themselves too. But no one rapes as many kids as the Catholic Church.
minus-squareNollij@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·1 month ago But no one rapes as many kids as the Catholic Church. Capitalism (esp. Reagan and Thatcher) would challenge that.
minus-squarePlutoniumAcid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoFiguratively, yes. Literally, no.
I’m pretty sure most of the popes were sexually active.
They “had” children. Sexually.
Because all religion is a scam used to control fools and children.
And Catholic priests swear they will never ever have sex with women and surround themselves with boys in dresses.
And they raped millions of kids. Doubtless many of them were raped themselves too.
But no one rapes as many kids as the Catholic Church.
Capitalism (esp. Reagan and Thatcher) would challenge that.
Figuratively, yes. Literally, no.