themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 26 天前VMware perpetual license holders receive cease-and-desist letters from Broadcomarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square127linkfedilinkarrow-up1636arrow-down15cross-posted to: sysadmin@lemmy.world
arrow-up1631arrow-down1external-linkVMware perpetual license holders receive cease-and-desist letters from Broadcomarstechnica.comthemachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 26 天前message-square127linkfedilinkcross-posted to: sysadmin@lemmy.world
minus-squarerottingleaf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down9·26 天前 with a database and a tech company attached There are three real DBMS options for enterprise - Oracle, PGSQL, MSSQL, and Oracle is the most powerful and least problematic of them.
minus-squarepyr0ball@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·26 天前How is it less problematic? I’ve only ever worked with the other two
minus-squarerottingleaf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·25 天前Well, compare setting up replication under Oracle and PGSQL.
minus-squareNinjasftw@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·25 天前Replication with postgres is really simple. Combine it with patroni and it’s so much better than oracle
minus-squarerottingleaf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·24 天前Oh, I’m not a DBA, so a stupid question - how do you avoid PGSQL replication breaking on full vacuum of a table? With patroni, shmatroni, macaroni, whatever.
There are three real DBMS options for enterprise - Oracle, PGSQL, MSSQL, and Oracle is the most powerful and least problematic of them.
How is it less problematic? I’ve only ever worked with the other two
Well, compare setting up replication under Oracle and PGSQL.
Replication with postgres is really simple. Combine it with patroni and it’s so much better than oracle
Oh, I’m not a DBA, so a stupid question - how do you avoid PGSQL replication breaking on full vacuum of a table? With patroni, shmatroni, macaroni, whatever.