It only takes one zombie to raze a bunker full of people. It only takes one cough to infect someone with a cold. It only takes $1 to mark your payment NSF and incur the penalty.
That’s the point I’m trying to make. That 10% could be HUGE! You can’t quantity life and say “we almost got there, but let’s just say we did.” Would you say I won the race if I only made it 90% of the way?
You need to change your conception “evidence.” Like I asked before, if you had a fatal disease, would you be willing to bet your life on a 90% scan?
Arguments are cool and all, but at the end of the day, you need them to actually have real implications or else… like why?
It only takes one zombie to raze a bunker full of people. It only takes one cough to infect someone with a cold. It only takes $1 to mark your payment NSF and incur the penalty.
That’s the point I’m trying to make. That 10% could be HUGE! You can’t quantity life and say “we almost got there, but let’s just say we did.” Would you say I won the race if I only made it 90% of the way?
You need to change your conception “evidence.” Like I asked before, if you had a fatal disease, would you be willing to bet your life on a 90% scan?
Arguments are cool and all, but at the end of the day, you need them to actually have real implications or else… like why?
I don’t get it. Are you rejecting science as a tool for discerning truth? Did you even read my post? Because I did answer your question about the 90%.