Other questions include whether science organisation receives funding from China and whether it is a climate or ‘environmental justice’ project

Archived version: https://archive.is/20250325042257/https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/mar/25/csiro-australia-science-agency-questioned-trump-administration-us-government-interests


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.

  • Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    9 days ago

    From your linked article:

    "While the term was defined originally to mean “methods and attitudes typical of or attributed to natural scientists”, some scholars, as well as political and religious leaders, have also adopted it as a pejorative term with the meaning “an exaggerated trust in the efficacy of the methods of natural science applied to all areas of investigation”

    That "worshipping " wording is, by your own sources, a political act.

    Pulling a definition out of your arse and then judging a whole group of people based on your made up beliefs… You’re not an anarchist, you’re a trumpist in decline, pitching people against each others instead of standing up for others.

    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      Look at their username. Couple that with their commentary and it’s one to steer clear of.