Yeah, no.

  • qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sure, then $20 for the mobile app, and $60 for MacOS (which should include a mobile copy). That would work for me too. I don’t have a Steam Deck, but I for sure would not pay full price for a game just to play on the Steam Deck.

    • ampersandrew@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the Switch and the Steam Deck have shown that portable games are worth every bit as much as non-portable, but in both of these cases, they output easily to the larger experience at home. I think Apple is providing that too. $60 still makes sense to me, since you’re always buying the MacOS version which includes a mobile copy, which you said was acceptable.

      • qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What if you don’t have a Mac though, the MacOS copy is going to waste. I think Nintendo games are far too expensive as well. I own some, but I’m not happy with the price of the games (my kids love them though).

        • ampersandrew@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not a Mac OS copy and an iOS copy any more than I have a Steam Deck copy of a game and a desktop copy of a game. From what I can tell, it’s the same thing. Obviously this is beneficial for Apple keeping you in their ecosystem, but this serves the same function. Quite frankly, I’m not sure why you’d have an iPhone if you don’t have a Mac, but I know plenty of people do.