• Joe Bidet@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    20 hours ago

    A European Citizen Initiative requires a massive investment to come through (quotas of signature per country, amount of signatures, quantity of personal data signatories have to give away, etc.) while at the same time it cannot force the EU to do anything. the Commission can just decide to file it vertically (in the trash can) and they often do.

    So speak about a glorified, expansive petition… and you may find modes of action that are way way more efficient.

  • AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 day ago

    Everything mission critical to the governent should be open source and secure in my opinion. Of course using mastodon would be nice but what is extremely important is to start using linux insead of microsoft and similar examples because they pose a genuine risk.

    • ToxicWaste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      just talked with a coworker about that. europe is heavily relying on microsoft products and investing a lot of money into them. we are certain, that all that money can easily pay for an expert team to develop and maintain a eu-gov linux distro.

      i know that certain military branches maintain a hardened version of different linux distros for critical systems. why not take this to the next level and have an expert team maintaining your OS?

    • piratekaiser@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      As opposed to Linux, which poses a penguin risk.

      Puns aside, I completely agree with you, but that one might be either the best or the worst thing to happen to OSS. Best case scenario the govt. ensures critical technology is funded and maintained, is invested in and essentially brings a sustainable model for maintainers. Worst case, open source is regulated out of existence as we know it. There was a piece of EU legislation that thankfully didn’t pass, which would’ve resulted in just that. Here’s a reference, sorry I don’t have the time right now for a better one.

  • unused_user_name@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think no government should depend on any commercial platform to communicate with its citizens. As low tech as possible and workable would be best I suppose, so maybe just a website? Mastodon could work too I guess.

  • GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    22 hours ago

    How does moderation work in that case? It would have to have comments disabled if it’s government ran or they risk censoring (or not censoring) people. Either that or a non-government entity could run an eu instance and only give accounts to officials from various countries/groups/entities.

    • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Would it be technically infeasible for their servers to only handle their own stuff, but where responses to it could still be made externally, viewable depending on what you federate with?

      • GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I guess if they just don’t federate or only federating with other official instances. If people want to discuss it, then they can just link to it. Can you subscribe to non-fed instances?

  • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    Honestly it just seems nutty to me that every sovereign government isn’t running its own mastodon instance for PR stuff.

    They can continue posting to xitter if they really want.

  • EuropeanMade@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    I would love for the “official/non personal” accouts to be on Mastodon. I feel strongly they should do whatever they like in their time off, but for the love of the fediverse please use Mastodon for official communication. A lot of my country’s politicians (the Netherlands) are using Twitter/X to communicate and I hate it. (They even argue on there… I’m not missing that)

    • civilconvo@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Tbh, what I’ve understood EU has been trying to help create it for years. It just never got wings to fly. Maybe now there’s enough lift.

  • oakward@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I believe each country should host their instance of Mastodon free of censorship (under legal limits, of course). These instances should give accounts to members of political parties. These instances would be federated with as many other instances as possible.

    What would be possible flaws of this system?

    • Tuukka R@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      I actually not want our politicians to personally read all emails I send to them. There’s a ton of emails to read and I would prefer the politicians doing something else than just reading endless emails.

      They’ve got aides for that, and the aides will inform the politician about the relevant content in the emails. And will of course forward individual emails to the politician if they so wish. The important thing is that the emails get read by the politician’s office.

        • Tuukka R@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Somebody still has to do the city-wide politics. This with per street politicians could work, if they functioned like aides, but… then they would be aides.

          Also, if there was one politician representing my street, and he is aligned politically very differently than I am, then I’ve got zero chances of getting the city to hear me. If I want less houses but much taller, and the representative wants single-family homes, me having an idea of how to make it possible to build one more tall house on my street would just crash into my street-representative’s political opinions. Now I can contact a politician that thinks the same was I do about what is good and what is bad. I can write them an email. They won’t read it, but someone in their office will, and then it will have an effect on the politician’s work. Depends on the politician, of course, but that’s something I take into account when choosing whom to vote.