• ploot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Prior to the firings, about 1,700 staff worked at NSF, managing their $9 billion federal budget that funds research on everything from astrophysics to civil engineering. Staff were called to an emergency meeting at 10 a.m. ET, held on Zoom and in person, where they were told by Micah Cheatham, NSF’s chief management officer, that they’d be terminated by the end of the day, without severance. According to sources who were present, NSF Director Sethuraman Panchanathan, who ordered the firings, did not attend the meeting.

    “Firing talented people, including scientists, who have already invested a year or two with the agency is a waste of resources,” says Neal Lane, who served as director of the NSF from 1993 to 1998. “The U.S. needs more scientists, engineers and other technical talent. These firings will cause many of them to leave the field.”

    More of that government efficiency we’ve been hearing of. The USA will be left behind in science and technology while the rest of the world moves on. For a businessman Trump has an extremely poor grasp of the concept of investment.

    American scientists should emigrate to countries that actually value what they do.

    • Eq0
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      As a scientist (at the moment not US based): yes, people will leave the US. Some of my contacts have been considering relocating since the election results were out.

      Being a scientist means being connected to a broad network of international institutions and colleagues, it’s possibly one of the fields in which relocation is easiest. This is such a shortsighted measure! Save some cash now, tank research for the generation to come…