“Definitely never seen this type of response to a FOIA request,” quipped one journalist.

  • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yep:

    “I don’t want to abolish government. I simply want to reduce it to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub.” — Grover Norquist

    That was 25 years ago. It’s always been their plan. They want to dismantle democracy and replace it with a corporatocracy, oligarchy, or similar authoritarian structure.

    • Kalysta@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      No. They want to make it small enough to fit in a woman’s uterus because that’s all they give a shit about regulating

      • 5in1k@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        When it’s not single digits and ice storming in a couple weeks I think people are going to take to the streets. Everyone I talk to is pissed except the unreachable morons.

      • Bieren@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        All the maga 2nd amendment bible beaters that voted for the talking Cheeto are too busy kicking their wife and jerking off to pics of trump to worry about anything.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          3 days ago

          It’s the situation they claim it’s for, but no it isn’t. The second amendment is to have a militia ready to defend the nation in case of invasion. Militias were the norm at the time, not standing professional armies, which the newly founded tiny union of states certainly didn’t expect to have. That time came and went though and some people carried the corpse of the second amendment and turned it into something else that it clearly isn’t.

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            There’s one more step that brings it back to the same place. The thinking behind standing armies is that they would be used for tyranny. The reason for loosely connected militias is that there isn’t a singular guy who is Commander-in-Chief of all of them. There was even attempts at a militia Navy, which is a hilarious idea to me (“Got my musket and my rowboat. Off to defend the motherland!” Rows up to 28-gun British heavy frigate)

            It’s not a practical system of defense in the modern age. It barely was back then.

          • BenLeMan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            To be fair, it wasn’t some people but the majority opinion of Chief Justice Antonin Scalia in DC v. Heller (2008) that swept away the militia part as a mere “prefatory clause”. 😔

    • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      “I don’t want to abolish government. I just want to have the ability to abolish the government on a whim. Whether the government just so happens to be abolished or not after that is up to the direction of the wind and whether the sun gets in my eyes.”