The Duff CEO with a Windows-Logo on his forehead: “Gamers use Windows because of its’ user experience not our de facto monopoly.”

Next Image: Duff CEO with Windows-Logo in front of a “Out of Business” sign. Subtitle: “30 minutes after SteamOS is released”

Edit: Yo, I’m not saying this is gonna happen. I just want to say that Windew’s UX sucks ass.

    • msage@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      We don’t need spy backdoors in Linux, keep that shit in Windows.

      Adoption does not include bad things.

      • stevedice@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        44 minutes ago

        Yes, it does. Whoever wants to install the “spy backdoors” should be able to. It’s called freedom. Look it up.

        • msage@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          41 minutes ago

          You can break it yourself if you compile your own kernel. I do, btw.

          No need to support it for the general public.

          • stevedice@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            31 minutes ago

            No need to support it for the general public

            Unless the general public wants to play a game that requires it. You’re living in your own world.

            • msage@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              24 minutes ago

              Stop giving companies excuses to do outrageous shit.

              Like it’s absolutely mindboggling how much shit do people eat in order to play a game. Kernel level anticheat has access to your entire computer, and you can’t even know what it does.

              And for absolutely no benefit at all. You can make anticheats on server, or simple client stuff without reading your entire memory.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Well if they are losing out on sales due to practices that are incompatible with Linux then companies are less likely to use those practices in the future.

      • stevedice@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Remember back when people said nothing was wrong with Linux gaming and it was actually game studios that had to start developing for Linux so the studios changed their practices and started developing native Linux games? Yeah, me neither.

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Because people were still buying the games on Windows. If people start actively not buying things then it encourages change. If people complain but still buy it anyway then nothing will change. Vote with your wallet (which is what OP is doing).

          • stevedice@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Voting with your wallet doesn’t work when you’re 3% of the 3%. It didn’t work to get games on Linux and it won’t work to get rid of kernel anticheat. Wanna know what works? Making things work. Like Valve did with Proton while people like OP were voting with their wallet.

            • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 hours ago

              So what is your problem with what OP is doing? That they aren’t personally releasing games to compete with the ones using kernel level anti-cheat?

              Like Valve did with Proton while people like OP were voting with their wallet.

              Do you think that was profitable for Steam (from people voting with their wallet), or do you think Steam did it for charity out of the kindness of their hearts?

              • stevedice@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                4 hours ago

                My problem is that being in denial about the state of gaming on Linux (better than before, still garbage) does nothing to improve the state of gaming on Linux.

                Do you think that was profitable for Steam (from people voting with their wallet), or do you think Steam did it for charity out of the kindness of their hearts?

                You seem to think that Valve developed Proton to capture the Linux marketshare. That’s unbelievably naive.

                • msage@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  36 minutes ago

                  How is gaming support on Linux “still garbage”?

                  90% of games work out of the box. No tweaks, just press play.

                  You have options for launchers, Steam, Heroic, Lutris…

                  I’ve dropped Windows about 8 years ago, and I missed on a couple of games, mostly due to the anticheat bullshit.

                  I even mod my games on Linux without issues.

                  There were more issues with gaming on Windows than issues I had on Linux.

                  • stevedice@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    8 minutes ago

                    It could be 99% of games and it wouldn’t matter if the remaining 1% are what people actually wanna play. Support for games outside of Steam is beyond the capabilities of most PC users. Most people don’t actually enjoy playing Troubleshooting Simulator.

                • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  You seem to think that Valve developed Proton to capture the Linux marketshare. That’s unbelievably naive.

                  Okay, so why did they develop it?

                  • stevedice@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    3 hours ago

                    Because Microsoft has the power to end Steam almost overnight so Valve is desperately trying to move people away from Windows. Linux just happened to be a useful tool but Proton aims to capture the Linux userbase about as much as ChromeOS does.