• stewie3128@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 年前

    25 years ago in my suburban Chicago public high school district, my stats teacher brought out the teacher pay schedule for us to play with.

    There were six columns:

    Bachelors, bachelors+30, bachelors+60 Masters, masters+30, masters+60

    The +30 or +60 refer to credit hours of additional college coursework

    Each row showed the number of years of experience.

    In 1998, the upper-left (fresh out of college, no experience) salary was around $38,500 or something.

    The bottom right (masters+60 or doctorate, and 30 or 35 years of experience [I forget]) was $151,000. And they got a great pension (fatter than what teachers in IL starting now will get).

    You also got a small multiplier for each extra curricular you ran.

    We had mostly excellent teachers as a result. Couple of duds too, but that’s life. 70+% of graduating seniors went to college of some kind within two years. I believe I went to a good school.

    But this is what happens when you fund schools through property taxes: the good neighborhoods get good schools, and it propels a virtuous cycle. The bad neighborhoods get bad schools, and they just spiral downward. It’s a dumb way to fund education.